Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 2;17(1):45.
doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00626-0.

An AI-based multiphase framework for improving the mechanical ventilation availability in emergency departments during respiratory disease seasons: a case study

Affiliations

An AI-based multiphase framework for improving the mechanical ventilation availability in emergency departments during respiratory disease seasons: a case study

Miguel Ortiz-Barrios et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Shortages of mechanical ventilation have become a constant problem in Emergency Departments (EDs), thereby affecting the timely deployment of medical interventions that counteract the severe health complications experienced during respiratory disease seasons. It is then necessary to count on agile and robust methodological approaches predicting the expected demand loads to EDs while supporting the timely allocation of ventilators. In this paper, we propose an integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Discrete-event Simulation (DES) to design effective interventions ensuring the high availability of ventilators for patients needing these devices.

Methods: First, we applied Random Forest (RF) to estimate the mechanical ventilation probability of respiratory-affected patients entering the emergency wards. Second, we introduced the RF predictions into a DES model to diagnose the response of EDs in terms of mechanical ventilator availability. Lately, we pretested two different interventions suggested by decision-makers to address the scarcity of this resource. A case study in a European hospital group was used to validate the proposed methodology.

Results: The number of patients in the training cohort was 734, while the test group comprised 315. The sensitivity of the AI model was 93.08% (95% confidence interval, [88.46 - 96.26%]), whilst the specificity was 85.45% [77.45 - 91.45%]. On the other hand, the positive and negative predictive values were 91.62% (86.75 - 95.13%) and 87.85% (80.12 - 93.36%). Also, the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve plot was 95.00% (89.25 - 100%). Finally, the median waiting time for mechanical ventilation was decreased by 17.48% after implementing a new resource capacity strategy.

Conclusions: Combining AI and DES helps healthcare decision-makers to elucidate interventions shortening the waiting times for mechanical ventilators in EDs during respiratory disease epidemics and pandemics.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Discrete-Event-Simulation (DES); Emergency Department (ED); Healthcare; Mechanical ventilation; Random Forest (RF).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests regarding this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart representing the pathway from the initial patient dataset to the derivation of training and test cohorts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean Decrease of Gini Coefficient for candidate predictors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curve for the prediction of mechanical intervention probability in the test subset
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proposed ED procedure for predicting mechanical ventilation needs based on AI
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Virtual representation of patient arrival, waiting time before triage, and admission
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison among the current ED configuration and strategies S1, S2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dondorp AM, Hayat M, Aryal D, Beane A, Schultz MJ. Respiratory support in COVID-19 patients, with a focus on resource-limited settings. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;102(6):1191. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dar M, Swamy L, Gavin D, Theodore A. Mechanical-ventilation supply and options for the COVID-19 pandemic. Leveraging all available resources for a limited resource in a crisis. Annals Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(3):408–16. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202004-317CME. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Currie CS, Fowler JW, Kotiadis K, Monks T, Onggo BS, Robertson DA, Tako AA. How simulation modelling can help reduce the impact of COVID-19. J Simul. 2020;14(2):83–97. doi: 10.1080/17477778.2020.1751570. - DOI
    1. Wang M, Flessa S. Modelling COVID-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect? Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(5):665–8. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01202-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Caution about early intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:78. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00692-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources