Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 2;21(1):36.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01581-y.

Dietary quality and dietary greenhouse gas emissions in the USA: a comparison of the planetary health diet index, healthy eating index-2015, and dietary approaches to stop hypertension

Affiliations

Dietary quality and dietary greenhouse gas emissions in the USA: a comparison of the planetary health diet index, healthy eating index-2015, and dietary approaches to stop hypertension

Sarah M Frank et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) measures adherence to the dietary pattern presented by the EAT-Lancet Commission, which aligns health and sustainability targets. There is a need to understand how PHDI scores correlate with dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and how this differs from the carbon footprints of scores on established dietary recommendations. The objectives of this study were to compare how the PHDI, Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) relate to (a) dietary GHGE and (b) to examine the influence of PHDI food components on dietary GHGE.

Methods: We used life cycle assessment data from the Database of Food Recall Impacts on the Environment for Nutrition and Dietary Studies to calculate the mean dietary GHGE of 8,128 adult participants in the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Poisson regression was used to estimate the association of (a) quintiles of diet score and (b) standardized dietary index Z-scores with dietary GHGE for PHDI, HEI-2015, and DASH scores. In secondary analyses, we used Poisson regression to assess the influence of individual PHDI component scores on dietary GHGE.

Results: We found that higher dietary quality on all three indices was correlated with lower dietary GHGE. The magnitude of the dietary quality-dietary GHGE relationship was larger for PHDI [-0.4, 95% CI (-0.5, -0.3) kg CO2 equivalents per one standard deviation change] and for DASH [-0.5, (-0.4, -0.6) kg CO2-equivalents] than for HEI-2015 [-0.2, (-0.2, -0.3) kg CO2-equivalents]. When examining PHDI component scores, we found that diet-related GHGE were driven largely by red and processed meat intake.

Conclusions: Improved dietary quality has the potential to lower the emissions impacts of US diets. Future efforts to promote healthy, sustainable diets could apply the recommendations of the established DASH guidelines as well as the new guidance provided by the PHDI to increase their environmental benefits.

Keywords: 24-hour recalls; Dietary approaches to stop hypertension; Dietary greenhouse gas emissions; Dietary patterns; EAT-Lancet Commission; Healthy eating index; NHANES; Planetary Health Diet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Histogram of mean daily greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) in kilograms-CO2 equivalents, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015–2018
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Predicted greenhouse gas emissions by quintile of Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015–2018* * Poisson regression models adjusted for total energy intake *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001 for the difference from Quintile 1. With the application of the Bonferroni correction statistical significance is defined as p < 0.0125 (0.05/4 comparisons = 0.0125)

References

    1. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tilman D, Clark M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature. 2014;515(7528):518–22. doi: 10.1038/nature13959. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caro D, Davis SJ, Bastianoni S, Caldeira K. Greenhouse gas emissions due to meat production in the last fifty years. Quantification of climate variability, adaptation and mitigation for agricultural sustainability. 2017:27–37.
    1. Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 2018;360(6392):987–92. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anastasiou K, Baker P, Hadjikakou M, Hendrie G, Lawrence M. A conceptual framework for understanding the environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods and implications for sustainable food systems. J Clean Prod. 2022:133155.