Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):144-151.
doi: 10.21037/jss-23-87. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

Intraoperative fat embolism syndrome associated with implantation of titanium sacroiliac joint fusion implants: a report of two cases

Affiliations
Case Reports

Intraoperative fat embolism syndrome associated with implantation of titanium sacroiliac joint fusion implants: a report of two cases

Alexander C Aretakis et al. J Spine Surg. .

Abstract

Background: For patients undergoing long-construct fusion surgeries, simultaneous sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a growing trend in spine surgery. Some options for posterior SIJ fusion include 3D-printed triangular titanium implants or self-harvesting SIJ screws. Both implants require fixation within the sacrum and ileum. Fat embolism syndrome is a rare but known complication of lumbar pedicle instrumentation but has never been reported in association with SIJ fusion, regardless of implant type. We report the first two known cases of fat embolism associated with placement of SIJ fusion devices during long construct posterior spine fusion.

Case description: Case 1-a 50-year-old female with multiple previous spine surgeries complicated by osteomyelitis/diskitis that was successfully eradicated, underwent T10-pelvis posterior spinal fusion (PSF), L4 pedicle-subtracting-osteotomy, and bilateral SIJ fusion. During implantation of each SIJ fusion device, the patient's hemodynamic status deteriorated necessitating vasopressor support, intravenous fluid bolus, and hyperventilation, but quickly resolved. The case was completed without further issue, and she had an uneventful post-operative course. Case 2-a 71-year-old female with a past medical history of ankylosing spondylitis, previous L2-L5 PSF, rheumatoid arthritis on chronic steroids, underwent a T9-pelvis PSF, bilateral SIJ fusion, L4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy, T10-L1 Smith Peterson osteotomies. After implantation of the second SIJ fusion device, she became hypotensive and tachycardic, pulses were absent, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated. Pulses returned quickly, the index surgery was terminated, and she was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). In the ICU she was quickly weaned off the ventilator on post-operative day 1. On post-operative day 4, the patient returned to the operating room for completion of the surgery and had an extended, but uneventful, recovery afterwards.

Conclusions: We report on the first two known cases of fat embolism syndrome occurring immediately after implantation of SIJ fusion devices. Spine surgeons should be aware of this rare, but potentially fatal, complication. Collaboration with the anesthesia team and optimization of the patient's hemodynamic status prior to implantation may help prevent catastrophic complications.

Keywords: Fat embolism syndrome; case report; intraoperative fat embolism; sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJ fusion).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-23-87/coif). D.C.O.Y. reports the grants from Globus, Medtronic, SeaSpine; Royalties from SeaSpine; consulting fees from Medtronic, SeaSpine. He also received the payment from Medtronic Advisory Board for Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. C.J.K. reports the grants from Globus, Medtronic, SeaSpine, Medacta, Personalized Spine Study Group, Synergy, SI Bone and consulting fee from Medtronic, Allosource, SeaSpine Inc., Biocomposites. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative standing anterior-posterior and lateral X-rays of case 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post-operative biplanar X-rays of case 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Timeline of case 1. PSF, posterior spinal fusion; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion; I&D, incision and drainage; PSO, pedicle subtracting osteotomy; SIJ, sacroiliac joint.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pre-operative anterior-posterior and lateral X-rays of case 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Post-operative day 3 biplanar X-rays for case 2.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Timeline of case 2. TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; PSF, posterior spinal fusion; PSO, pedicle subtracting osteotomy; PCO, posterior column osteotomy; SIJ, sacroiliac joint; ICU, intensive care unit; POD, post-operative day.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. York PJ, Kim HJ. Degenerative Scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017;10:547-58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manzetti M, Ruffilli A, Barile F, et al. Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration and Pain After Spinal Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review. Clin Spine Surg 2023;36:169-82. - PubMed
    1. Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Satake K, et al. Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbopelvic Fixation. Global Spine J 2022;12:1158-64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anwar FN, Nie JW, Hartman TJ, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Contem Spine Surg 2023;24:1-5.
    1. Sarkar M, Maalouly J, Ruparel S, et al. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Fusion Rates and Clinical Improvement Using Minimally Invasive Approach and Intraoperative Navigation and Robotic Guidance. Asian Spine J 2022;16:882-9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types