Sex Differences in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival and Progression: A Multidimensional Analysis
- PMID: 38568048
- DOI: 10.1002/ana.26933
Sex Differences in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival and Progression: A Multidimensional Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To investigate sex-related differences in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) prognosis and their contributing factors.
Methods: Our primary cohort was the Piemonte and Aosta Register for ALS (PARALS); the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) and the Answer ALS databases were used for validation. Survival analyses were conducted accounting for age and onset site. The roles of forced vital capacity and weight decline were explored through a causal mediation analysis. Survival and disease progression rates were also evaluated after propensity score matching.
Results: The PARALS cohort included 1,890 individuals (44.8% women). Men showed shorter survival when stratified by onset site (spinal onset HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, p = 0.0439; bulbar onset HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.70, p = 0.006917), although women had a steeper functional decline (+0.10 ALSFRS-R points/month, 95% CI 0.07-0.15, p < 0.00001) regardless of onset site. Instead, men showed worse respiratory decline (-4.2 forced vital capacity%/month, 95% CI -6.3 to -2.2, p < 0.0001) and faster weight loss (-0.15 kg/month, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.05, p = 0.0030). Causal mediation analysis showed that respiratory function and weight loss were pivotal in sex-related survival differences. Analysis of patients from PRO-ACT (n = 1,394, 40.9% women) and Answer ALS (n = 849, 37.2% women) confirmed these trends.
Interpretation: The shorter survival in men is linked to worse respiratory function and weight loss rather than a faster disease progression. These findings emphasize the importance of considering sex-specific factors in understanding ALS pathophysiology and designing tailored therapeutic strategies. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:159-169.
© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
References
-
- Longinetti E, Fang F. Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an update of recent literature. Curr Opin Neurol 2019;32:771–776. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000730.
-
- Chiò A, Moglia C, Canosa A, et al. ALS phenotype is influenced by age, sex, and genetics: a population‐based study. Neurology 2020;94:e802–e810. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008869.
-
- Palmieri A, Mento G, Calvo V, et al. Female gender doubles executive dysfunction risk in ALS: a case‐control study in 165 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:574–579. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-307654.
-
- Knibb JA, Keren N, Kulka A, et al. A clinical tool for predicting survival in ALS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-312908.
-
- Westeneng HJ, Debray TPA, Visser AE, et al. Prognosis for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: development and validation of a personalised prediction model. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30089-9.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
