Benralizumab efficacy and safety in severe asthma: A randomized trial in Asia
- PMID: 38570145
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107611
Benralizumab efficacy and safety in severe asthma: A randomized trial in Asia
Abstract
Background: Benralizumab is indicated as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled, severe eosinophilic asthma; it has not yet been evaluated in a large Asian population with asthma in a clinical trial.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with severe asthma in Asia.
Methods: MIRACLE (NCT03186209) was a randomized, Phase 3 study in China, South Korea, and the Philippines. Patients aged 12-75 years with severe asthma receiving medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonists, stratified (2:1) by baseline blood eosinophil count (bEOS) (≥300/μL; <300/μL), were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab 30 mg or placebo. Endpoints included annual asthma exacerbation rate (AAER; primary endpoint), change from baseline at Week 48 in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1) and total asthma symptom score (TASS). Safety was evaluated ≤ Week 56.
Results: Of 695 patients randomized, 473 had baseline bEOS ≥300/μL (benralizumab n = 236; placebo n = 237). In this population, benralizumab significantly reduced AAER by 74% (rate ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.19, 0.36], p < 0.0001) and significantly improved pre-BD FEV1 (least squares difference [LSD] 0.25 L [95% CI 0.17, 0.34], p < 0.0001) and TASS (LSD -0.25 [-0.45, -0.05], p = 0.0126) versus placebo. In patients with baseline bEOS <300/μL, there were numerical improvements in AAER, pre-BD FEV1, and TASS with benralizumab versus placebo. The frequency of adverse events was similar for benralizumab (76%) and placebo (80%) in the overall population.
Conclusions: MIRACLE data reinforces the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma in an Asian population, consistent with the global Phase 3 results.
Keywords: Anti-Interleukin-5 receptor; Biologics; China; Eosinophilic asthma; Exacerbations.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Nanshan Zhong reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Kefang Lai reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Dejun Sun reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Ranran Dai reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Ronnie Samoro reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Hae-Sim Park reports financial support was provided by AstraZeneca. Annika Astrand reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. David Cohen reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Maria Jison reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Vivian H Shih reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Viktoria Werkstrom reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Yuhui Yao reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Yajuan Zhang reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Wenying Zheng reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Tanya Jandu and Helen Brereton of inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare Ltd, UK, provided medical writing support, which was funded by AstraZeneca. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources