Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;17(2):553-560.
doi: 10.1007/s12194-024-00798-7. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Monte carlo simulation study on the dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer distributions in carbon ion radiotherapy

Affiliations

Monte carlo simulation study on the dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer distributions in carbon ion radiotherapy

Akihisa Ishikawa et al. Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) is conventionally evaluated from the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-LETd fitted function used in the treatment planning system. In this study, we calculated the physical doses and their linear energy transfer (LET) distributions for patterns of typical CIRT beams using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The LETd was then deduced from the MC simulation and compared with that obtained from the conventional method. The two types of LETd agreed well with each other, except around the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak. Furthermore, an MC simulation was conducted with the material composition of water and realistic materials. The profiles of physical dose and LETd were in good agreement for both techniques. These results indicate that the previous studies to analyze the minimum LETd in CIRT cases are valid for practical situations, and the material composition conversion to water little affects the dose distribution in the irradiation field.

Keywords: Carbon ion radiotherapy; Monte Carlo simulation; PHITS; RT-PHITS for CIRT; Retrospective study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Tobias CA, et al. Radiological physics characteristics of the extracted heavy ion beams of the bevatron. Science. 1971;174(4014):1131–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4014.1131 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirao Y, et al. Heavy ion synchrotron for medical use—HIMAC project at NIRS-Japan—. Nucl Phys A. 1992;538:541–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(92)90803-R . - DOI
    1. Kamada T, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical experience. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):e93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70412-7 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yanagi T, et al. Dose–volume histogram and dose–surface histogram analysis for skin reactions to carbon ion radiotherapy for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Radiother Oncol. 2009;95(1):60–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.041 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okonogi N, et al. Dose-averaged linear energy transfer per se does not correlate with late rectal complications in carbon-ion radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2020;153:272–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.029 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources