Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Mar 4;16(3):e55481.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.55481. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Medical Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Unique Approach

Affiliations
Case Reports

Medical Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Unique Approach

Pankaj Salvi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

One of the rarest types of ectopic pregnancy, with an incidence of 1:1,800, is cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Here, we report the case of a 28-year-old woman who had undergone two previous cesarean sections. She arrived at our labor room with per vaginal spotting and abdominal pain with an ultrasound that revealed a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. The initial beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) value upon admission was 27,133 mIU/mL. Her ultrasound findings were confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging. Opting for combined medical management, we successfully treated her using systemic methotrexate and mifepristone, avoiding surgical intervention despite high β-hCG values. There is currently no established standardized treatment for cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies, and we feel that treatment must be tailored to every patient's individual needs. Our experience suggests that combining mifepristone and systemic methotrexate can be an effective approach with better curative effects, emphasizing the need for further research.

Keywords: gynecology and obstetrics; medical management; methotrexate ectopic; mifepristone; scar ectopic pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging showing the gestational sac measuring approximately 1.15 cm × 2.39 cm.
Figure 2
Figure 2. T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging with the red arrow representing the gestational sac.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Graphical representation of β-hCG values on various treatment days with blue arrows indicating when methotrexate was given.
β-hCG = beta-human chorionic gonadotropin; D = day

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scar ectopic pregnancy. Patel MA. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65:372–375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:220–227. - PubMed
    1. Caesarean scar pregnancy. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. BJOG. 2007;114:253–263. - PubMed
    1. Cesarean scar pregnancy: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. Osborn DA, Williams TR, Craig BM. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1449–1456. - PubMed
    1. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. [ Dec; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources