Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 28:55:98-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.athplu.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Treatment intensification with bempedoic acid to achieve LDL-C goal in patients with ASCVD: A simulation model using a real-world patient cohort in the US

Affiliations

Treatment intensification with bempedoic acid to achieve LDL-C goal in patients with ASCVD: A simulation model using a real-world patient cohort in the US

Kristen Migliaccio-Walle et al. Atheroscler Plus. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Guidelines recommend that high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) be treated with maximally tolerated statins to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. In patients whose LDL-C remains elevated, non-statin adjunct therapies, including ezetimibe (EZE), bempedoic acid (BA), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are recommended.

Methods: The impact of BA and EZE in a fixed-dose combination (FDC) on LDL-C goal attainment was evaluated using a simulation model developed for a United States cohort of high-risk adults with ASCVD. Treatment was simulated for 73,056 patients not at goal (LDL-C >70 mg/dL), comparing BA + EZE (FDC), EZE only, and no oral adjunct therapy (NOAT). The addition of PCSK9 inibitors was assumed after 1 year in patients not at LDL-C goal. Treatment efficacy was estimated from clinical trials. Patient-level outcomes were predicted over a 10-year horizon accounting for treatment discontinuation and general mortality.

Results: Baseline mean age of the cohort was 67 years, most were White (79%) and male (56%). A majority had established coronary artery disease (75%), 48% had diabetes, and mean LDL-C was 103.0 mg/dL. After 1 year, 79% of patients achieved LDL-C goal (mean, 61.1 mg/dL) with BA + EZE (FDC) compared to 58% and 42% with EZE (71.7 mg/dL) and NOAT (78.4 mg/dL), respectively.

Conclusions: This simulation shows that adding BA + EZE (FDC) to maximally tolerated statins would result in more patients achieving LDL-C goal than adding EZE alone or NOAT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Kristen Migliaccio-Walle reports financial support was provided by Esperion Therapeutics Inc. Kristen Migliaccio-Walle reports writing assistance was provided by Spark Therapeutics Inc. David Elsea, Kristel Griffith, Rajshree Pandey reports financial support was provided by Esperion Therapeutics Inc. Anand Gupta reports financial support was provided by Esperion Therapeutics Inc. Evelyn Sarnes, Kristin Gillard reports writing assistance was provided by Spark Therapeutics Inc. Evelyn Sarnes, Kristin Gillard reports a relationship with Esperion Therapeutics Inc that includes: employment and equity or stocks. co-author previously employed by Genetech Inc - RP.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Model structure. LDL-C goal was <70 mg/dL in base case; <55 mg/dL explored in scenario analysis. Dashed lines were 50% in base case, and 0% or 100% in scenarios. BA = bempedoic acid; EZE = ezetimibe; FDC = fixed-dose combination; LDL-C = low density lipoprotein cholesterol; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular event; PCSK9i = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients in the overall population predicted to reach LDL-C goal at year 1 with and without PCSK9 inhibitor. Values may not add up to the total values due to rounding. BA = bempedoic acid; EZE = ezetimibe; FDC = fixed-dose combination; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NOAT = no oral adjunct therapy; PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Predicted LDL-C levels at year 1, by treatment pathway. LDL-C levels at year 1 for patients recieving (A) BA + EZE (FDC) (n = 71,645), (B) EZE (n = 71,737), and (C) NOAT (n = 71,587). Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding. The total number of patients included in each analysis represents the number of patients simulated to be alive at year 1. BA = bempedoic acid; EZE = ezetimibe; FDC = fixed-dose combination; LDL-C = low density lipoprotein cholesterol; NOAT = no oral adjunct therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Virani S.S., Alonso A., Aparicio H.J., Benjamin E.J., Bittencourt M.S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ritchey M.D., Wall H.K., Owens P.L., Wright J.S. Vital signs: state-level variation in nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events targeted for prevention by million hearts 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:974–982. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhindsa D.S., Sandesara P.B., Shapiro M.D., Wong N.D. The evolving understanding and approach to residual cardiovascular risk management. Review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:88. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Angelantonio E., Gao P., Pennells L., Kaptoge S., Caslake M., et al. Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction. JAMA. 2012;307:2499–2506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.6571. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grundy S.M., Stone N.J., Bailey A.L., Beam C., Birtcher K.K., et al. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;73:3168–3209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002. 2019. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources