A pathway to strengthening open science: comments on the draft South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines
- PMID: 38572431
- PMCID: PMC10989741
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1304950
A pathway to strengthening open science: comments on the draft South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines
Abstract
The recently released draft South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines: Principles, Processes and Structures (Draft Guidelines) by the National Health Research Ethics Council recognize open data and provide guiding principles for this in the context of health research in South Africa. While its inclusion is a positive development, there is room for improvement. Although the Draft Guidelines leverage the Draft National Policy on Data and Cloud, it lacks incorporation of other relevant government policies, notably the Draft National Open Science Policy, and fails to sufficiently detail the principles of open science and open access. This limited scope and lack of comprehensive definition and detailed guidance present challenges for researchers in conducting ethical and responsible health research in South Africa. It constrains the Draft Guidelines from fully aligning with national imperatives and from fostering African-centric approaches. To address these issues, it is recommended that the Draft Guidelines integrate broader policies and principles, enhance clarity through comprehensive definitions, provide detailed guidance on open access, and promote African-centric approaches. Implementing these solutions will strengthen the Draft Guidelines, aligning them with national visions of open science, and thereby harnessing the full potential of South Africa's diverse scientific community in advancing health research.
Keywords: South Africa; data; genomics; health research; open access; open science; policy.
Copyright © 2024 Gooden.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Open science and human genetic data: recommendations on South Africa's Draft National Open Science Policy.Front Genet. 2023 Oct 2;14:1248747. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1248747. eCollection 2023. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 37849503 Free PMC article.
-
Forcing a square into a circle: why South Africa's draft revised material transfer agreement is not fit for purpose.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 12;15:1333672. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1333672. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38533256 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28153006 Free PMC article.
-
Science and Society: Pathways to Equitable Access and Delivery of Genomics Medicine in Africa.Curr Genet Med Rep. 2025;13(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s40142-024-00211-0. Epub 2025 Feb 24. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2025. PMID: 40012965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethics and the AIDS pandemic in the developing world.J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2003 Apr-Jun;2(2):81-7. doi: 10.1177/154510970300200205. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2003. PMID: 12961762 Review.
References
-
- Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) Department of Science and Technology (DST). (2018). Human genetics and genomics in South Africa: ethical, legal and social Implications. 10.17159/assaf.2018/0033 - DOI
-
- Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) (2019). African open science platform – Part 1: landscape study. Available at: https://aosp.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/aosplandscape-12aug2019_c....
-
- Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) (2023). POPIA Code of conduct for research. Available at: https://www.assaf.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ASSAf-POPIA-Code-of-....
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources