Glenohumeral morphological predictors of recurrent shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair
- PMID: 38572679
- DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12169
Glenohumeral morphological predictors of recurrent shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenohumeral morphological features on a magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) to determine risk factors for recurrence of anterior shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR).
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ABR between 2012 and 2017 was performed to identify patients who had recurrence of instability following stabilisation (Group 1). These were pair-matched in a 2:1 ratio for age, gender and sport with a control (Group 2) who underwent ABR without recurrence. Preoperative MRAs were evaluated for risk factors for recurrence, with glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions also measured. Multilinear and multilogistic regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting recurrence.
Results: Overall, 72 patients were included in this study, including 48 patients without recurrence and 24 patients with recurrent instability. There was a significant difference between the two groups in mean glenoid bone loss (Group 1: 7.3% vs. Group 2: 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and the rate of off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (Group 1: 20.8% vs. Group 2: 0%, p = 0.0003). Of the variables analysed in logistic regression, increased glenoid anteversion (p = 0.02), acromioclavicular (AC) degeneration (p = 0.03) and increased Hill-Sachs width were associated with increased risk of failure. Increased chondral version (p = 0.01) and humeral head diameter in the anteriorposterior view were found to be protective and associated with a greater likelihood of success.
Conclusion: Glenoid anteversion was a risk factor for recurrent instability, whereas increased chondral version and humeral head diameter were associated with higher rates of success following ABR. Glenoid bone loss, presence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, increased Hill-Sachs width and AC degeneration were also associated with failure. These findings should be used by surgeons to stratify risk for recurrence following ABR.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: Bankart repair; athlete; instability; recurrence; shoulder.
© 2024 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aygün Ü, Çalik Y, Işik C, Şahin H, Şahin R, Aygün DÖ. The importance of glenoid version in patients with anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:1930–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.018
-
- Boileau P, Villalba M, HÉRY JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1755–1763. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200608000-00010
-
- Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM, Parten PM. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:488–491. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32212
-
- Cannizzaro CK, Schuette HB, Houck DA, Wolcott ML, Vidal AF, McCarty EC, et al. Sex‐based differences in recurrence rates following arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization: a systematic review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020;2:e637–e644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.04.004
-
- Chalmers PN, Beck L, Granger E, Henninger H, Tashjian RZ. Superior glenoid inclination and rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.043
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
