Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar-Apr;31(2):e2965.
doi: 10.1002/cpp.2965.

Evaluating Suicide Risk Stratification in Outpatient Settings: A Vignette-Based Approach

Melissa A Litschi  1 , Steven L Lancaster  1 , David J Linkh  1 , Stephanie Renno  1 , Tracy A Neal-Walden  1 , Claire E Lawless  1 , Alisa A Breetz  1
Affiliations

Evaluating Suicide Risk Stratification in Outpatient Settings: A Vignette-Based Approach

Melissa A Litschi et al. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Suicide risk assessment and stratification are a key suicide prevention strategy in mental health care systems that treat military service members and veterans. The aim of the current mixed-method project was to address a gap in our knowledge as to how therapists make these important clinical decisions. This manuscript reports the results of a project during which six vignettes were developed reflecting varying levels of risk according to the Rocky Mountain MIRECC Risk Stratification Table. Mental health therapists were asked to evaluate the risk level of each vignette, determine a treatment disposition, and provide justification for their ratings. The results of the study indicate that therapists can reliably evaluate risk, but that treatment planning tended to be based more on vignette-specific factors than essential features of the risk model. The qualitative findings revealed variations in the definition and perception of foundational concepts, suggesting a need for further research and training in these domains. Overall, the results support the use of vignettes as a method to assess clinical decision-making and provide several areas for further training and research.

Keywords: clinical decision‐making; risk stratification; suicide; veteran; vignette.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bahraini, N., L. A. Brenner, C. Barry, et al. 2020. “Assessment of Rates of Suicide Risk Screening and Prevalence of Positive Screening Results Among US Veterans After Implementation of the Veterans Affairs Suicide Risk Identification Strategy.” JAMA Network Open 3, no. 10: e2022531. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22531
    1. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis Is Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2: 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Converse, L., K. Barrett, E. Rich, and J. Reschovsky. 2015. “Methods of Observing Variations in Physicians' Decisions: The Opportunities of Clinical Vignettes.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 30: 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606‐015‐3365‐8
    1. Evans, S. C., M. C. Roberts, J. W. Keeley, et al. 2015. “Vignette Methodologies for Studying Clinicians' Decision‐Making: Validity, Utility, and Application in ICD‐11 Field Studies.” International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 15, no. 2: 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001
    1. Gale, T. M., C. J. Hawley, J. Butler, A. Morton, and A. Singhal. 2016. “Perception of Suicide Risk in Mental Health Professionals.” PLoS ONE 11, no. 2: e0149791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149791

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources