Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests to screen for at-risk MASH-An individual participant data meta-analysis
- PMID: 38573034
- DOI: 10.1111/liv.15914
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests to screen for at-risk MASH-An individual participant data meta-analysis
Abstract
Background & aims: There is a need to reduce the screen failure rate (SFR) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials (MASH+F2-3; MASH+F4) and identify people with high-risk MASH (MASH+F2-4) in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate non-invasive tests (NITs) screening approaches for these target conditions.
Methods: This was an individual participant data meta-analysis for the performance of NITs against liver biopsy for MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4. Index tests were the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, liver stiffness measured using vibration-controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and thresholds including those that achieved 34% SFR were reported.
Results: We included 2281 unique cases. The prevalence of MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4 was 31%, 24% and 7%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-4 were .78, .75, .68 and .57 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-3 were .73, .67, .60, .58 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F4 were .79, .84, .81, .76 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. The sequential combination of FIB-4 and LSM-VCTE for the detection of MASH+F2-3 with threshold of .7 and 3.48, and 5.9 and 20 kPa achieved SFR of 67% and sensitivity of 60%, detecting 15 true positive cases from a theoretical group of 100 participants at the prevalence of 24%.
Conclusions: Sequential combinations of NITs do not compromise diagnostic performance and may reduce resource utilisation through the need of fewer LSM-VCTE examinations.
Keywords: FAST; FIB‐4; LSM‐VCTE; MASH; NFS; at‐risk MASH; non‐invasive tests.
© 2024 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multi‐society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann Hepatol. 2023;29:101133. doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101133
-
- Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11‐20. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109
-
- Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1313‐1321. doi:10.1002/hep.20701
-
- Simon TG, Roelstraete B, Khalili H, Hagström H, Ludvigsson JF. Mortality in biopsy‐confirmed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: results from a nationwide cohort. Gut. 2021;70(7):1375‐1382. doi:10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-322786
-
- Brunt EM, Clouston AD, Goodman Z, et al. Complexity of ballooned hepatocyte feature recognition: defining a training atlas for artificial intelligence‐based imaging in NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2022;76:1030‐1041. doi:10.1016/J.JHEP.2022.01.011
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous

