Neck and shoulder pain in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 10 years after posterior spinal fusion
- PMID: 38573384
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08233-6
Neck and shoulder pain in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 10 years after posterior spinal fusion
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to determine the clinical significance of neck and shoulder pain (NSP) 10 years after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and the relationship between radiographic parameters and NSP.
Methods: Of 72 patients who underwent PSF for thoracic AIS (Lenke 1 or 2) between 2000 and 2013, we included 52 (46 females; Lenke type 1 in 34 patients and type 2 in 18; mean age, 25.6 years) who underwent NSP evaluation using visual analog scale (VAS, 10 cm) 10 years postoperatively (follow-up rate, 72.2%). Correlation analyses were performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r).
Results: The VAS for NSP was 2.6 cm in median and 3.4 cm in mean at 10 years. The VAS had significant negative correlations with several SRS-22 domain scores (rs = - 0.348 for pain, - 0.347 for function, - 0.308 for mental health, and - 0.372 for total) (p < 0.05). In addition, the VAS score was significantly correlated with cervical lordosis (CL) (rs = 0.296), lumbar lordosis (rs = - 0.299), and sacral slope (rs = 0.362) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, at the 10-year follow-up, CL was significantly negatively correlated with T1 slope (rs = - 0.763) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) (- 0.554 for T1-12 and - 0.344 for T5-12) (p < 0.02).
Conclusion: NSP was associated with deterioration in SRS-22 scores, indicating that NSP is a clinically significant long-term issue in PSF for thoracic AIS. Restoring or maintaining the TK and T1 slopes, which are controllable factors during PSF, may improve cervical lordosis and alleviate NSP at 10-year follow-up.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Cervical spinal alignment; Long-term follow-up; Neck pain; Posterior spinal fusion; Shoulder pain.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Lonner BS, Ren Y, Yaszay B, Cahill PJ, Shah SA, Betz RR, Samdani AF, Shufflebarger HL, Newton PO (2018) Evolution of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over 20 years: have outcomes improved? Spine 43:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002332 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ries Z, Harpole B, Graves C, Gnanapragasam G, Larson N, Weintstein S, Mendoza-Lattes SA (2015) Selective thoracic fusion of lenke i and ii curves affects sagittal profiles but not sagittal or spinopelvic alignment: a case-control study. Spine 40:926–934. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000861 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Luo SG, Zhong ZM, Zhu SY, Chen JT (2018) The change of cervical sagittal alignment after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 171:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.019 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hiyama A, Sakai D, Watanabe M, Katoh H, Sato M, Mochida J (2016) Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 42 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 24 normal adolescents. Eur Spine J 25:3226–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4701-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Charles YP, Sfeir G, Matter-Parrat V, Sauleau EA, Steib JP (2015) Cervical sagittal alignment in idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation and in situ bending. Spine 40:E419-427. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000767 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical