Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jun 1;10(6):709-717.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0207.

FOLFIRI Plus Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: The PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

FOLFIRI Plus Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: The PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST Randomized Clinical Trial

David Tougeron et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric or gastrooesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited.

Ojectives: To determine the efficacy of 1 or 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) in the treatment of advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Design, setting, and participants: The PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial is a randomized, multicenter, noncomparative, phase 2 trial, conducted from August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, at 37 centers in France that included patients with advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had disease progression after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 [PD-L1]) (FD arm) or FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) (FDT arm). The efficacy analyses used a clinical cutoff date of January 9, 2023.

Main outcome and measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months according to RECIST 1.1 criteria evaluated by investigators.

Results: Overall, between August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, 96 patients were randomized (48 in each arm). The median age was 59.7 years, 28 patients (30.4%) were women and 49 (53.3%) had GEJ tumors. Four month PFS was 44.7% (90% CI, 32.3-57.7) and 55.6% (90% CI, 42.3-68.3) in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. The primary end point was not met. Median PFS was 3.8 and 5.4 months, objective response rates were 34.7% and 37.7%, and median overall survival was 13.2 and 9.5 months in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Disease control beyond 1 year was 14.9% in the FD arm and 24.4% in the FDT arm. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 22 (47.8%) patients in each arm. A combined positive score (CPS) PD-L1 of 5 or higher was observed in 18 tumors (34.0%) and a tumor proportion score (TPS) PD-L1 of 1% or higher in 13 tumors (24.5%). Median PFS according to CPS PD-L1 was similar (3.6 months for PD-L1 CPS ≥5 vs 5.4 months for PD-L1 CPS <5) by contrast for TPS PD-L1 (6.0 months for PD-L1 TPS ≥1% vs 3.8 months for PD-L1 TPS <1%).

Conclusions and relevance: Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with FOLFIRI in second-line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma showed an acceptable safety profile but antitumor activity only in a subgroup of patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959293.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Tougeron reported personal fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Roche, Servier, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. Dr Dahan reported personal fees from Servier, Oseus, Pierre Fabre, and Viatris outside the submitted work. Dr Evesque reported personal fees from Servier, BMS, AstraZeneca, and MSD during the conduct of the study. Dr Aparicio reported nonfinancial support from MSD and personal fees from BMS during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Pierre fabre outside the submitted work. Dr Bouché reported personal fees from Amgen, Apmonia Therapeutics, Bayer, Merck Sereno, Pierre Fabre, Servier, MSD, and Deciphera outside the submitted work. Dr Chibaudel reported personal fees from Roche, Sanofi, Amgen, Bayer, Beigine, Merck, Pierre Fabre, MSD, BMS, Servier, and SeqOne outside the submitted work. Dr Zaanan reported personal fees from Amgen, Astellas, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Servier, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Zymeworks, Havas Life, and Alira Health during the conduct of the study; grants from Amgen outside the submitted work. Dr Perret reported personal fees from MSD, Pierre Fabre, and BMS outside the submitted work. Dr Di Fiore reported personal fees from Amgen, Bayer, Incyte, BMS, Merck, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Viatris, Pierre Fabre, and AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study. Dr Lepage reported personal fees from AAA, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Deciphera, and Ipsen outside the submitted work. Dr Artru reported personal fees from Servier, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, MSD, BMS, Roche, and Amgen outside the submitted work. Dr Louvet reported personal fees from Amgen, MSD, Roche, and Servier outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Trial Profile
FD arm indicates FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) plus durvalumab; FDT arm, FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab; mITT, modified intention-to-treat population.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Curves
A, There were 44 treatment events in the FD arm and and 41 in the FDT arm. B, There were 36 treatment events in the FD arm and 36 in the FDT arm. FD arm indciates FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) plus durvalumab; FDT arm, FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90. doi:10.3322/caac.20107 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. . Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(4):666-673. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn717 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. ; V325 Study Group . Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4991-4997. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8429 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Hofheinz R, et al. . Biweekly fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction: a phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(11):1882-1887. - PubMed
    1. Van Cutsem E, Boni C, Tabernero J, et al. . Docetaxel plus oxaliplatin with or without fluorouracil or capecitabine in metastatic or locally recurrent gastric cancer: a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):149-156. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu496 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

Associated data