Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0301053.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301053. eCollection 2024.

Political participation among deaf youth in Great Britain

Affiliations

Political participation among deaf youth in Great Britain

Francisco Espinoza et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Variations in political participation are linked to demographic factors, socioeconomic disparities, and cultural-ethnic diversity. Existing research has primarily explored reduced political involvement among individuals with disabilities, particularly in electoral politics. However, little research has attended the involvement of deaf people specifically. This is of interest because deaf youth are at an intersection of disability, language and cultural identity with their language affiliations and rejection or acceptance of disability evolving through childhood. This study draws from original data collected via an online survey, comprising 163 deaf young respondents aged 16-19 in Great Britain. We compare their levels of political participation with those of general population peers to explore how sociodemographic factors, alongside variations in self-identification as deaf, and meaningful interactions with other deaf people contribute to explain their political engagement. The results challenge conventional wisdom by demonstrating that deaf youth participate more actively in politics than their hearing peers in various forms of political involvement, including collective, contact, and institutional activism. We also recognize differences among deaf youth and propose that social aspects of identity formation, particularly embracing a deaf identity and having deaf friends, can boost certain forms of political engagement. In summary, this study underscores the importance of acknowledging the diversity of deaf youth in terms of affiliation with various forms of deaf identity, rendering their experience different from both disabled and hearing youth. By identifying the factors driving heightened political participation, policymakers and advocates can develop strategies to enhance political engagement among all young people, regardless of their hearing status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Differences in the probability of engagement in political participation (odds ratio).
The figure presents the odds ratio of involvement for READY participants in signing petitions, posting online and contacting their MP, compared to the probabilities among the general population.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Differences in the probability of engagement in political participation (odds ratio).
The figure presents the odds ratio of involvement for READY participants in attending demonstrations, political meetings, wearing a badge, boycotting a product and volunteering, compared to the probabilities among the general population.

References

    1. Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady HE. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press; 1995.
    1. Coffé H, Bolzendahl C. Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation. Sex Roles. 2010;62(5):318–333. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pattie C, Seyd P, Whiteley P. Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain. Political Studies. 2003;51(3):443–468. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00435 - DOI
    1. Grasso M, Smith K. Gender Inequalities in Political Participation and Political Engagement among Young People in Europe: Are Young Women Less Politically Engaged than Young Men? Politics. 2022;42(1):39–57. doi: 10.1177/02633957211028813 - DOI
    1. Grasso M, Giugni M. Intra-Generational Inequalities in Young People’s Political Participation in Europe: The Impact of Social Class on Youth Political Engagement. Politics. 2022;42(1):13–38. doi: 10.1177/02633957211031742 - DOI