Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jul 11;64(1):2301521.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01521-2023. Print 2024 Jul.

Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma by previous biologic use and key clinical subgroups: real-world XALOC-1 programme

Affiliations
Observational Study

Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma by previous biologic use and key clinical subgroups: real-world XALOC-1 programme

David J Jackson et al. Eur Respir J. .

Abstract

Background: Pivotal phase 3 trials and real-world studies have demonstrated benralizumab's overall efficacy and safety in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Additional large-cohort data are needed to confirm its real-world effectiveness in SEA according to previous biologic use and key baseline characteristics important for treatment selection.

Methods: XALOC-1 is a large, multinational, retrospective, observational, real-world study programme of benralizumab in adults with SEA. This 48-week integrated analysis assessed annualised exacerbation rate (AER), maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use, asthma symptom control and lung function during a 12-month baseline period and up to 48 weeks after benralizumab initiation. Subgroup analyses were based on previous biologic use and key baseline clinical characteristics (mOCS use, blood eosinophil count, exacerbation history, age at asthma diagnosis, fractional exhaled nitric oxide level and presence of atopy and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps).

Results: Out of 1002 patients analysed, 380 were biologic-experienced. At week 48, 71.3% were exacerbation-free (versus 17.2% at baseline); relative reduction in AER was 82.7% overall and 72.9% in biologic-experienced patients; rates were maintained across all key clinical characteristic subgroups. Of patients using mOCS at baseline (n=274), 47.4% (130 out of 274) eliminated their use by week 48; the mean reduction from baseline in daily dose was 51.2% and, notably, 34.9% in biologic-experienced patients (n=115). Clinically significant improvements in asthma symptom control and lung function were observed.

Conclusion: In this large, real-world programme, SEA patients treated with benralizumab had substantial improvements in clinical outcomes irrespective of previous biologic use and key clinical characteristics important to therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: D.J. Jackson has received consultancy fees and speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Regeneron, and research grants from AstraZeneca. G. Pelaia has received lecture fees and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Guidotti, Insmed, Lusofarmaco, Menarini, Neopharmed Gentili, Novartis, Sanofi and Zambon. B. Emmanuel, T.N. Tran, D. Cohen, V.H. Shih, A. Shavit, M. Watt, S. Kayaniyil, M. Pardal, D. Arbetter and A.P.J. Rabe are employees of, and own stock in, AstraZeneca. S. Boarino and J. Nuevo are employees of AstraZeneca. R. Katial (currently of National Jewish Health and University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA) and E. Garcia-Gil (currently of Almirall, Barcelona, Spain) were employees of AstraZeneca at the time the study was conducted. C. Chaves Loureiro has received consultancy fees and speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Regeneron and Teva, and research grants from GlaxoSmithKline. A. Padilla-Galo reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, personal fees, and non-financial support from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Teva, and personal fees from ALK, Bial and FAES, outside the submitted work. P. Nair reports that in the past two years, his institution received grant support from AstraZeneca, Cyclomedica, Equillium, Foresee, Genentech, Sanofi and Teva; he has also received honoraria from Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi.

Figures

None
In this large, real-world programme, patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab had substantial improvements in clinical outcomes, irrespective of previous biologic use and key clinical characteristics important to decision-making in clinical practice. #: 3 units Asthma Control Test score or −0.5 units in 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score. AER: annualised exacerbation rate; MCID: minimal clinically important difference; mOCS: maintenance oral corticosteroid; Q8W: every 8 weeks.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Relative reduction in annualised exacerbation rate (AER) from baseline to week 48, overall and according to patients’ previous biologic experience and key baseline clinical characteristics. Analyses are based on patients treated with benralizumab who either discontinued before week 48 or completed 48±4 weeks of follow-up from the index date. The number of patients in each subgroup for the analyses is shown. Baseline data relate to exacerbations during the 12-month baseline period prior to the index date. Week 48 data relate to exacerbations during the follow-up period from the index date to week 48±4. mOCS: maintenance oral corticosteroid; BEC: blood eosinophil count; FENO: fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CRSwNP: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. #: the most recent measurement in the 12-month baseline period; : based on medical records available at the index date.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
a) Median maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) daily dose at baseline and week 48, and b) percentage of patients with a 100% reduction in mOCS dose from baseline to week 48, overall and according to patients’ previous biologic experience, among patients who were using mOCS at the index date. Data are based on patients who were using mOCS at the index date and had follow-up data at week 48. The box and whisker plots show the medians, interquartile ranges and minimum and maximum values for mOCS daily dose. #: mOCS dose was calculated as the patient's mean daily dosage over the past 30 days on or prior to the target date of the specified visit (the index date or week 48).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean percentage change in maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) dose from baseline to week 48, overall and according to patients’ previous biologic experience and key baseline clinical characteristics, in patients using mOCS at the index date. mOCS dosage was calculated as a patient's mean daily dosage over the past 30 days on or prior to the target date of the specified visit (the index date or week 48). The number of patients with mOCS use at the index date and with follow-up data at week 48 is shown. BEC: blood eosinophil count; FENO: fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CRSwNP: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. #: most recent measurement in the 12-month baseline period. : based on medical records available at the index date.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Percentage of patients with improvements matching or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (3 units) or 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) score (–0.5 units) from baseline to week 48, overall and according to patients’ previous biologic experience and key baseline clinical characteristics. Baseline ACQ-6 and ACT scores were measured at the index date or were the most recent measurement in the 12-month baseline period prior to the index date. The number of patients with ACQ-6 or ACT score data at baseline and week 48±4 is shown. Analyses are based on patients with ACQ-6 or ACT score data at baseline and week 48±4. mOCS: maintenance oral corticosteroid; BEC: blood eosinophil count; FENO: fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CRSwNP: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. #: at the index date or the most recent measurement in the 12-month baseline period; : based on medical records available at the index date.

Comment in

References

    1. Hekking PW, Wener RR, Amelink M, et al. . The prevalence of severe refractory asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135: 896–902. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heaney LG, de Llano L P, Al-Ahmad M, et al. . Eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma: an expert consensus framework to characterize phenotypes in a global real-life severe asthma cohort. Chest 2021; 160: 814–830. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Busse WW, Kraft M, Rabe KF, et al. . Understanding the key issues in the treatment of uncontrolled persistent asthma with type 2 inflammation. Eur Respir J 2021; 58: 2003393. doi:10.1183/13993003.03393-2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolbeck R, Kozhich A, Koike M, et al. . MEDI-563, a humanized anti–IL-5 receptor alpha mAb with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity function. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125: 1344–1353. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moran AM, Ramakrishnan S, Borg CA, et al. . Blood eosinophil depletion with mepolizumab, benralizumab, and prednisolone in eosinophilic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 1314–1316. doi:10.1164/rccm.202003-0729LE - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types