Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 15;37(4):571-579.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00379. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

Screening for Forensically Relevant Drugs Using Data-Independent High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Affiliations

Screening for Forensically Relevant Drugs Using Data-Independent High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Maia N Bates et al. Chem Res Toxicol. .

Abstract

Forensic and clinical laboratories are expected to provide a rapid screening of samples for a wide range of analytes; however, the ever-changing landscape of illicit substances makes analysis complicated. There is a great need for untargeted methods that can aid these laboratories in broad-scope drug screening. Liquid chromatography hyphenated with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) has become a popular technique for untargeted screening and presumptive identification of drugs of abuse due to its superior sensitivity and detection capabilities in complex matrices. An untargeted extraction and data acquisition method was evaluated for the broad screening of high-priority drugs of abuse in whole blood. A total of 35 forensically relevant target analytes were identified and extracted at biologically relevant low and high (10× low) concentrations from whole blood using supported liquid extraction. Data-independent acquisition was accomplished using ultraperformance liquid chromatography and a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Results were acceptable for screening assays, with limits of detection at or below the recommended low-concentration cutoffs for most analytes. Analyte ionization varied from 30.1 to 267.6% (average: 110.5%) at low concentrations and from 8.6 to 383.5% (average: 93.6%) at high concentrations. Extraction recovery ranged from 8.5 to 330.5% (average: 105.3%) at low concentrations and from 9.4 to 127.5% (average: 82.7%) at high concentrations. This variability was also captured as precision, ranging from 4.7 to 135.2% (average: 36.5%) at low concentrations and from 0.9 to 59.0% (average: 21.7%) at high concentrations. The method described in this work is efficient and effective for qualitative forensic toxicology screening, as demonstrated by analysis of 166 authentic suspected impaired driver and postmortem specimens. That said, it is critical that laboratories establishing untargeted LC-HRMS screening assays be aware of the strengths and limitations across diverse drug categories and chemical structures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

    1. Krotulski A. J.; Papsun D. M.; Walton S. E.; Fogarty M. F.; Logan B. K.. NPS Discovery, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, 2023. https://www.cfsre.org/images/trendreports/yir-2022/2022_Year%20In%20Revi... (accessed July 26, 2023).
    1. O’Donnell J.; Gladden R. M.; Mattson C. L.; et al. Vital Signs: Characteristics of Drug Overdose Deaths Involving Opioids and Stimulants — 24 States and the District of Columbia, January–June 2019. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 1189–1197. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rygaard K.; Pan M.; Nielsen M. K. K.; Dalsgaard P. W.; Rasmussen B. S.; Linnet K. Overview of Systematic Toxicological Analysis Strategies and Their Coverage of Substances in Forensic Toxicology. Anal. Sci. Adv. 2023, 4 (3–4), 96–103. 10.1002/ansa.202200062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrell L. J.; Kerrigan S.; Logan B. K. Recommendations for toxicological investigations of drug impaired driving. J. Forensic Sci. 2007, 52, 1214–1218. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00516.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Logan B. K.; D’Orazio A. L.; Mohr A. L. A.; Limoges J. F.; Miles A. K.; Scarneo C. E.; Kerrigan S.; Liddicoat L. J.; Scott K. S.; Huestis M. A. Recommendations for Toxicological Investigation of Drug-Impaired Driving and Motor Vehicle Fatalities—2017 Update. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2018, 42 (2), 63–68. 10.1093/jat/bkx082. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms