Rescue from complications after pancreaticoduodenectomies at a low-volume Caribbean center: Value of tailored peri-pancreatectomy protocols
- PMID: 38577074
- PMCID: PMC10989354
- DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.681
Rescue from complications after pancreaticoduodenectomies at a low-volume Caribbean center: Value of tailored peri-pancreatectomy protocols
Abstract
Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically complex operation, with a relatively high risk for complications. The ability to rescue patients from post-PD complications is as a recognized quality measure. Tailored protocols were instituted at our low volume facility in the year 2013.
Aim: To document the rate of rescue from post-PD complications with tailored protocols in place as a measure of quality.
Methods: A retrospective audit was performed to collect data from patients who experienced major post-PD complications at a low volume pancreatic surgery unit in Trinidad and Tobago between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2023. Standardized definitions from the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery were used to define post-PD complications, and the modified Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify post-PD complications.
Results: Over the study period, 113 patients at a mean age of 57.5 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 9.23; range: 30-90; median: 56) underwent PDs at this facility. Major complications were recorded in 33 (29.2%) patients at a mean age of 53.8 years (SD: ± 7.9). Twenty-nine (87.9%) patients who experienced major morbidity were salvaged after aggressive treatment of their complication. Four (3.5%) died from bleeding pseudoaneurysm (1), septic shock secondary to a bile leak (1), anastomotic leak (1), and myocardial infarction (1). There was a significantly greater salvage rate in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores ≤ 2 (93.3% vs 25%; P = 0.0024).
Conclusion: This paper adds to the growing body of evidence that volume alone should not be used as a marker of quality for patients requiring PD. Despite low volumes at our facility, we demonstrated that 87.9% of patients were rescued from major complications. We attributed this to several factors including development of rescue protocols, the competence of the pancreatic surgery teams and continuous, and adaptive learning by the entire institution, culminating in the development of tailored peri-pancreatectomy protocols.
Keywords: Complication; Failure; Morbidity; Mortality; Pancreas; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Rescue.
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.World J Surg. 2023 Apr;47(4):1018-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06887-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13. World J Surg. 2023. PMID: 36637476 Review.
-
Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy at a resource-poor, low-volume center in Trinidad and Tobago.World J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 24;13(9):738-747. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i9.738. World J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36212600 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of surgical experience on management and outcome of pancreatic surgery performed in high- and low-volume centers.Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0422-3. Epub 2017 Feb 18. Updates Surg. 2017. PMID: 28215039
-
Evolution of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections for Pancreatic and Periampullary Diseases: Perioperative Outcomes of 605 Patients at a High-Volume Center.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1085-1092. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0737. Epub 2019 Jul 22. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019. PMID: 31334676
-
Morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a critical appraisal of 107 consecutive patients undergoing resection at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24865924 Review.
References
-
- Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:634–640. - PubMed
-
- van Rijssen LB, Zwart MJ, van Dieren S, de Rooij T, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, van Dam RM, van Eijck CH, Gerhards MF, Gerritsen JJ, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, de Jong KP, Kazemier G, Klaase J, van der Kolk BM, van Laarhoven CJ, Luyer MD, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rupert CG, Scheepers JJ, van der Schelling GP, Vahrmeijer AL, Busch ORC, van Santvoort HC, Groot Koerkamp B, Besselink MG Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Variation in hospital mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy is related to failure to rescue rather than major complications: a nationwide audit. HPB (Oxford) 2018;20:759–767. - PubMed
-
- Rosero EB, Romito BT, Joshi GP. Failure to rescue: A quality indicator for postoperative care. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021;35:575–589. - PubMed
-
- Portuondo JI, Shah SR, Singh H, Massarweh NN. Failure to Rescue as a Surgical Quality Indicator: Current Concepts and Future Directions for Improving Surgical Outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:426–437. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous