Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May-Jun;14(3):284-289.
doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

A comparative evaluation of masticatory load distribution in different types of prosthesis with varying number of implants: A FEM analysis

Affiliations

A comparative evaluation of masticatory load distribution in different types of prosthesis with varying number of implants: A FEM analysis

Roopal Srivastava et al. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 May-Jun.

Abstract

Aim: To identify the optimal number and position of implants to reduce stress concentration on the implant, denture, and attachment system for sustaining an overdenture prosthesis.

Materials and methods: By incorporating one to eight indigenous implants with bar-type attachments, eight 3D finite element models of mandibular overdentures were created. All models received a 200 N vertical load, and the biomechanical characteristics of peri-implant bone were assessed.

Result: The study observed that with a vertical load of 200 N, the maximum equivalent stress around peri-implant tissue in all models was within the physiological tolerance threshold of bone. The von Mises stress values ranged from 116.18 MPa to 536.7 MPa.

Conclusion: The three-implant-supported overdenture model revealed superior peri-implant stress, stability, cost-effectiveness, and hygiene maintenance outcomes. Placing a third implant in the mid-symphysis region may offer a practical solution to reduce rotations in two-implant-supported overdentures.

Keywords: Bar-supported; Complete denture; Finite element analysis; Implant-supported overdentures; Von mises stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Indigenous implant used in study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A to 2H: The four 3D finite element models of the edentulous mandible and prosthetic components: (A) represents model A (complete denture); (B) represents model B (single-implant model); (C) represents model C (two-implant model); (D) represents model D (three-implant model); (E) represents model E (four-implant model); (F) represents model F (four-implant all-on-four model); (G) represents model G (six-implant model); (H) represents model H (eight-implant model).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A to 3H: Equivalent strain distribution in the peri-implant bone of model A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H under a 200 N vertical loading condition. Colours indicate level of strain from dark blue (lowest) to red (highest).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gjengedal H., Berg E., Boe O.E., Trovik T.A. Self-reported oral health and denture satisfaction in partially and completely edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont (IJP) 2011 Jan-Feb;24(1):9–15. PMID: 21209996. - PubMed
    1. Lin Y.C., Chen J.H., Lee H.E., Yang N.P., Chou T.M. The association of chewing ability and diet in elderly complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont (IJP) 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):127–128. PMID: 20305849. - PubMed
    1. Liu J., Pan S., Dong J., Mo Z., Fan Y., Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent. 2013 Mar;41(3):241–249. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.008. Epub 2012 Nov 14. PMID: 23160036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harder S., Wolfart S., Egert C., Kern M. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures—results of preliminary prospective study. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):656–661. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Jul 28. PMID: 21821093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lahoti K., Pathrabe A., Gade J. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Nov-Dec;27(6):597–601. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.199587. PMID: 28169256. - DOI - PubMed