The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women: a systematic literature review
- PMID: 38577277
- PMCID: PMC10993388
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1268653
The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Introduction: The cost-effectiveness study of syphilis screening in pregnant women has not been synthesized. This study aimed to synthesize the economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women that might contribute to making recommendations on the future direction of syphilis screening approaches.
Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies published before 19 January 2023 and identified the cost-effectiveness analyses for syphilis screening in pregnant women. The methodological design quality was appraised by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist.
Results: In total, 17 literature met the eligibility criteria for a full review. Of the 17 studies, four evaluated interventions using different screening methods, seven assessed a combination of syphilis testing and treatment interventions, three focused on repeat screening intervention, and four evaluated the interventions that integrated syphilis and HIV testing. The most cost-effective strategy appeared to be rapid syphilis testing with high treatment rates in pregnant women who were positive.
Discussion: The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening for pregnancy has been widely demonstrated. It is very essential to improve the compliance with maternal screening and the treatment rates for positive pregnant women while implementing screening.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness; pregnant women; review; screening; syphilis.
Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Zhang, Hui, Qu, Xia, Xu, Shi, He, Cao and Hu.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Repeat Screening for Syphilis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):699-707. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002795. Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30095767
-
Screening for syphilis infection in pregnant women: evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 19;150(10):710-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-10-200905190-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19451578 Review.
-
Antenatal syphilis screening in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned from Tanzania.Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Sep;10(9):934-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01473.x. Trop Med Int Health. 2005. PMID: 16135202
-
Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy as an alternative screening strategy in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):e038505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038505. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33444184 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of antenatal syphilis point of care testing on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0247649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247649. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33765040 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The rise of congenital syphilis in Canada: threats and opportunities.Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 22;12:1522698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1522698. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39911782 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Korenromp EL, Rowley J, Alonso M, Mello MB, Wijesooriya NS, Mahiané SG, et al. . Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes-estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0211720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211720, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous