Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 1;48(3):300-314.
doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000330. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Sex and gender differences in upper extremity prosthesis rejection: A review of literature

Affiliations
Review

Sex and gender differences in upper extremity prosthesis rejection: A review of literature

Eric Henderson et al. Prosthet Orthot Int. .

Abstract

Prosthesis rejection is a significant barrier to rehabilitation of persons with upper limb difference. Many individual factors can affect device rejection, including a person's sex or gender. The objective of this narrative review was to explore the reported differences between the sexes and genders in upper limb prosthesis rejection. This review considered peer-reviewed, published research studies in which the study population were adults (aged 18 and older) who had unilateral or bilateral limb difference (any level) of any etiology with current, past, or no history of prosthetic device usage. Using identified keywords, index terms, and a peer-reviewed search filter, the literature was searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo. The reasons for rejection, disuse, or abandonment of prosthetic devices were extracted, with the focus on reported differences between sex and genders. After searching, 29 articles were selected for full-text review and 15 were included. Only 5 of 15 articles examined differences between the sexes. Women tend to reject upper extremity prostheses more than men both before and after being fit with a device; device characteristics, such as weight and cosmesis, do not appear to be appropriately designed for women; and there may not be adequate consideration of the goals for women with limb difference(s). There is inadequate reporting of sex and gender in the literature on prosthesis rejection; future studies should report and explore these factors to determine whether the needs of the full population with limb loss are being met.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Resnik LJ, Borgia ML, Clark MA. A National Survey of Prosthesis use in Veterans with major upper limb amputation: comparisons by gender. PM R 2020;12:1086–1098.
    1. NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health. Sex and Gender. Available at: https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sex-gender . Accessed April 8, 2022.
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Institute of Gender and Health Online Training Modules: Integrating Sex and Gender in Health Research. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49347.html . Accessed April 8, 2022.
    1. Torgrimson BN, Minson CT. Sex and gender: what is the difference? J Appl Physiol 2005;99:785–787.
    1. Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:236–257.