Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e081284.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081284.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2)

Affiliations

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2)

Bruno Mazuquin et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the high number of operations and surgical advancement, rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair has not progressed for over 20 years. The traditional cautious approach might be contributing to suboptimal outcomes. Our aim is to assess whether individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation results in less shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks after surgical repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff compared with current standard (delayed) rehabilitation.

Methods and analysis: The rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair (RaCeR 2) study is a pragmatic multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot phase. It has a parallel group design with 1:1 allocation ratio, full health economic evaluation and quintet recruitment intervention. Adults awaiting arthroscopic surgical repair of a full-thickness tear are eligible to participate. On completion of surgery, 638 participants will be randomised. The intervention (individualised early patient-directed rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to remove their sling as soon as they feel able, gradually begin using their arm as they feel able and a specific exercise programme. Sling removal and movement is progressed by the patient over time according to agreed goals and within their own pain and tolerance. The comparator (standard rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to wear the sling for at least 4 weeks and only to remove while eating, washing, dressing or performing specific exercises. Progression is according to specific timeframes rather than as the patient feels able. The primary outcome measure is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index total score at 12-week postrandomisation. The trial timeline is 56 months in total, from September 2022.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN11499185.

Keywords: orthopaedic & trauma surgery; physical therapy modalities; randomized controlled trial; shoulder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors declare support from the National Institute of Health and Care Research for the present manuscript. AM is non-executive director of the ISPOR. JLR is Past President of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (2021-2023). SD reports education consultancy contracts with Stryker, Smith and Nephew and Arthrex for teaching and training. SD is the president of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (2023–2025).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. DCTSU, Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit; NHS, National Health Service.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial schedule of assessments and outcomes. EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol five dimensions five levels; PI, principal investigator, QRI, quintet recruitment intervention, SPADI: Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

References

    1. Carr AJ, Cooper CD, Campbell MK, et al. . n.d. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair the UK rotator cuff surgery (UKUFF). Health Technol Assess;19:1–218. 10.3310/hta19800 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karjalainen TV, Jain NB, Heikkinen J, et al. . Surgery for rotator cuff tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;12:CD013502. 10.1002/14651858.CD013502 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. HES . Hospital episode statistics. hospital admitted patient care activity 2018-19. 2019.
    1. Littlewood C, Mazuquin B, Moffatt M, et al. . Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey of current practice (2020). Musculoskeletal Care 2021;19:165–71. 10.1002/msc.1514 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mazuquin B, Moffatt M, Gill P, et al. . Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses. PLOS ONE 2021;16:e0252137. 10.1371/journal.pone.0252137 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data