Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 6;25(1):241.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08072-2.

Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review

Affiliations

Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review

Chris J Selman et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aim to estimate the causal effect of one or more interventions relative to a control. One type of outcome that can be of interest in an RCT is an ordinal outcome, which is useful to answer clinical questions regarding complex and evolving patient states. The target parameter of interest for an ordinal outcome depends on the research question and the assumptions the analyst is willing to make. This review aimed to provide an overview of how ordinal outcomes have been used and analysed in RCTs.

Methods: The review included RCTs with an ordinal primary or secondary outcome published between 2017 and 2022 in four highly ranked medical journals (the British Medical Journal, New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association) identified through PubMed. Details regarding the study setting, design, the target parameter, and statistical methods used to analyse the ordinal outcome were extracted.

Results: The search identified 309 studies, of which 144 were eligible for inclusion. The most used target parameter was an odds ratio, reported in 78 (54%) studies. The ordinal outcome was dichotomised for analysis in 47 ( 33 % ) studies, and the most common statistical model used to analyse the ordinal outcome on the full ordinal scale was the proportional odds model (64 [ 44 % ] studies). Notably, 86 (60%) studies did not explicitly check or describe the robustness of the assumptions for the statistical method(s) used.

Conclusions: The results of this review indicate that in RCTs that use an ordinal outcome, there is variation in the target parameter and the analytical approaches used, with many dichotomising the ordinal outcome. Few studies provided assurance regarding the appropriateness of the assumptions and methods used to analyse the ordinal outcome. More guidance is needed to improve the transparent reporting of the analysis of ordinal outcomes in future trials.

Keywords: Ordinal outcomes; Proportional odds model; Randomised controlled trials; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study

References

    1. Velleman PF, Wilkinson L. Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. Am Stat. 1993;47(1):65–72. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1993.10475938. - DOI
    1. MacKenzie CR, Charlson ME. Standards for the use of ordinal scales in clinical trials. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6512):40–43. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6512.40. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–1096. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de la Ossa NP, Abilleira S, Jovin TG, García-Tornel Á, Jimenez X, Urra X, et al. Effect of direct transportation to thrombectomy-capable center vs local stroke center on neurological outcomes in patients with suspected large-vessel occlusion stroke in nonurban areas: the RACECAT randomized clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;327(18):1782–1794. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4404. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hubert GJ, Hubert ND, Maegerlein C, Kraus F, Wiestler H, Müller-Barna P, et al. Association between use of a flying intervention team vs patient interhospital transfer and time to endovascular thrombectomy among patients with acute ischemic stroke in nonurban Germany. JAMA. 2022;327(18):1795–1805. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources