Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;17(6):e013902.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013902. Epub 2024 Apr 7.

Visual Estimates of Coronary Slow Flow Are Not Associated With Invasive Wire-Based Diagnoses of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

Affiliations

Visual Estimates of Coronary Slow Flow Are Not Associated With Invasive Wire-Based Diagnoses of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

Kenneth L Harkin et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Coronary slow flow (CSF) by invasive coronary angiography is frequently understood to be an indicator of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients with ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries. However, the relationship between visual estimates of CSF and quantitative wire-based invasive diagnosis of CMD is uncertain.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled adults aged ≥18 years with stable ischemic heart disease who were referred for invasive coronary angiography. Individuals with ≥50% epicardial coronary artery stenosis were excluded. Invasive coronary angiography was reviewed for CSF, defined as ≥3 cardiac cycles to opacify distal vessels with contrast. Coronary function testing was performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery using bolus coronary thermodilution techniques to measure coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Invasively determined CMD was defined as abnormal CFR (<2.5), abnormal IMR (≥25), or both.

Results: Among 104 participants, the median age was 61.5 years and 79% were female. The median CFR was 3.6 (interquartile range, 2.5-4.7) and the median IMR was 21 (interquartile range, 13.3-28.0). Overall, 24.0% of participants had abnormal CFR, 34.6% had abnormal IMR, and 48.1% had a final diagnosis of invasively determined CMD. CSF was present in 23 participants (22.1%). The proportions of patients with CMD (56.5% versus 45.7%; P=0.36), abnormal CFR (17.4% versus 25.9%; P=0.40), and abnormal IMR (43.5% versus 32.1%; P=0.31) were not different in patients with versus without CSF.

Conclusions: Among patients with ischemia with nonobstructive coronary artery, CSF was not associated with abnormal CFR, IMR, or either abnormal CFR or IMR. CSF is not a reliable angiographic surrogate of abnormal CFR or IMR as determined by invasive, wire-based physiology testing.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03537586.

Keywords: coronary angiography; coronary circulation; ischemia; microvascular angina; thermodilution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures Dr Smilowitz has served on an advisory board for Abbott Vascular. Dr Reynolds reports in-kind donations from Abbott Vascular, Philips, SHL Telemedicine, and Siemens. Dr Serrano-Gomez reports speaking arrangements with AstraZeneca and Terumo. The other authors report no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Correlations between invasive coronary physiology parameters and visual estimates of the number of cardiac cycles required for distal coronary opacification. Panel A: Resting Mean Transit Time (Tmn): r=0.16, p=0.10 Panel B: Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): r=0.04; p=0.68 Panel C: Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR); r=0.24, p=0.01
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Correlations between invasive coronary physiology parameters and visual estimates of the number of cardiac cycles required for distal coronary opacification. Panel A: Resting Mean Transit Time (Tmn): r=0.16, p=0.10 Panel B: Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): r=0.04; p=0.68 Panel C: Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR); r=0.24, p=0.01
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Correlations between invasive coronary physiology parameters and visual estimates of the number of cardiac cycles required for distal coronary opacification. Panel A: Resting Mean Transit Time (Tmn): r=0.16, p=0.10 Panel B: Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): r=0.04; p=0.68 Panel C: Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR); r=0.24, p=0.01
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Associations between CSF and the prevalence of abnormal coronary microvascular function.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Associations between CSF and the prevalence of abnormal coronary microvascular function.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Associations between CSF and the prevalence of abnormal coronary microvascular function.

References

    1. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, Brindis RG, Douglas PS. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:886–895. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907272 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reynolds HR, Diaz A, Cyr DD, Shaw LJ, Mancini GBJ, Leipsic J, Budoff MJ, Min JK, Hague CJ, Berman DS, et al. Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaw LJ, Shaw RE, Merz CN, Brindis RG, Klein LW, Nallamothu B, Douglas PS, Krone RJ, McKay CR, Block PC, et al. Impact of ethnicity and gender differences on angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and in-hospital mortality in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2008;117:1787–1801. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.726562 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, Fleg JL. Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): Developing Evidence-Based Therapies and Research Agenda for the Next Decade. Circulation. 2017;135:1075–1092. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024534 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrom SZ, Pedersen F, Galatius S, Madsen JK, Jorgensen E, Kelbaek H, Prescott E. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:734–744. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr331 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data