Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Mar 30;26(4):euae066.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae066.

Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carriers: a multicentre, international analysis from the iSUSI project

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carriers: a multicentre, international analysis from the iSUSI project

Marco Schiavone et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: Catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has become an important tool to improve clinical outcomes in patients with appropriate transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. The aim of our analysis was to test whether VT ablation (VTA) impacts long-term clinical outcomes even in subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) carriers.

Methods and results: International Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (iSUSI) registry patients who experienced either an ICD shock or a hospitalization for monomorphic VT were included in this analysis. Based on an eventual VTA after the index event, patients were divided into VTA+ vs. VTA- cohorts. Primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of a combination of device-related appropriate shocks, monomorphic VTs, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were addressed individually. Among n = 1661 iSUSI patients, n = 211 were included: n = 177 experiencing ICD shocks and n = 34 hospitalized for VT. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed. Both the crude and the yearly event rate of the primary outcome (5/59 and 3.8% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 41/152 and 16.4% yearly event rate in the VTA-; log-rank: P value = 0.0013) and the cardiovascular mortality (1/59 and 0.7% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 13/152 and 4.7% yearly event rate VTA-; log-rank P = 0.043) were significantly lower in the VTA + cohort. At multivariate analysis, VTA was the only variable remaining associated with a lower incidence of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio 0.262 (0.100-0.681), P = 0.006].

Conclusion: In a real-world registry of S-ICD carriers, the combined study endpoint of arrhythmic events and cardiovascular mortality was lower in the patient cohort undergoing VTA at long-term follow-up.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT0473876.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00473876.

Keywords: Arrhythmic mortality; Catheter ablation; Defibrillator; Subcutaneous ICD; Ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A.D.R. is a consultant for Abbott. M.C. has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Biosense Webster. L.K. worked as a proctor for Boston Scientific. R.T. is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, Abbott Medical, and he received speaker’s honoraria from Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, Abbott Medical, and LifeTech and research grants from Abbott, Biosense Webster, and LifeTech. A.B. has received consultant and/or speaker fees from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cook Medical, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Spectranetics/Philips.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart summarizing the workflow resulting in the two final cohorts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in pre- (upper end)/post- (lower end) ventricular tachycardia (VT) event rates at individual patient level. ‘X’ indicates a pre-ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA) rate capping at 15 for graphical reasons.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for the primary outcome of interest. Red: patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA+ cohort). Blue: patients not undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA− cohort).

References

    1. Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, Winkel BG, Behr ER, Blom NA et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3997–4126. - PubMed
    1. Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1009–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schron EB, Exner DV, Yao Q, Jenkins LS, Steinberg JS, Cook JR et al. Quality of life in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial: impact of therapy and influence of adverse symptoms and defibrillator shocks. Circulation 2002;105:589–94. - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Gent M, Bailin S, Fain ES et al. Comparison of β-blockers, amiodarone plus β-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators—the OPTIC study: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;295:165–71. - PubMed
    1. Natale A, Zeppenfeld K, Della Bella P, Liu X, Sabbag A, Santangeli Pe et al. Twenty-five years of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a look back and a look forward. Europace 2023;25:euad225. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding