Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;25(3):59-65.
doi: 10.1177/17571774241230676. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

Identifying research priorities for infection prevention and control. A mixed methods study with a convergent design

Affiliations

Identifying research priorities for infection prevention and control. A mixed methods study with a convergent design

M P Smiddy et al. J Infect Prev. 2024 May.

Abstract

Background: Meaningful research creates evidence for Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) practice.

Aim: To establish Infection Prevention Society (IPS) members' research priorities to support future research projects.

Methods: A mixed methods convergent parallel design incorporating a cross-sectional survey of IPS members (2022-2023), and focus group findings from the IPS Consultative Committee, (October 2022). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were transcribed verbatim, entered into NVivo 12, and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

Findings/results: 132 IPS members responded to the survey, including 120 (90.9%) nurses. The three most prevalent priorities were: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (n = 84, 16.1%); IPC Training and Education (n = 77, 14.8%); and IPC Evidence-based Guidelines (n = 76, 14.6%). Analysis of the focus group transcripts identified six emergent themes 'Patient Centred Care', 'Training and Education', 'IPC Role and Identity', 'IPC Leadership', 'IPC is Everyone's Responsibility', and 'Research Activity'. Triangulation of findings demonstrated concordance between quantitative and qualitative findings with Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QIPS) and Training and Education identified as priority research areas.

Discussion: This study highlights the necessity of developing support systems and incorporating research priorities in QIPS, as well as Training and Education. The findings of this study align with the recommended core competencies and components for effective infection prevention and control programs, making them relevant to QIPS initiatives. The outcomes of the study will serve as a valuable resource to guide the IPS Research and Development Committee in delivering practical support to IPS members.

Keywords: Infection prevention; infection control; mixed methods research; quality improvement; research; research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Triangulated findings from member survey and focus group.

References

    1. Abdul Salam H, Dumit NY, Clinton M, et al. (2023) Transformational leadership and predictors of resilience among registered nurses: a cross-sectional survey in an underserved area. BMC Nursing 22: 37. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01192-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allegranzi B, Kilpatrick C, Storr J, et al. (2017) Global infection prevention and control priorities 2018–22: a call for action. Lancet Global Health 5(12): e1178–e1180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - DOI
    1. Burnett E, Cooper T, Wares K, et al. (2023) Designing an optimal infection prevention service: Part 1. Journal of Infection Prevention 24(1): 3–10. DOI: 10.1177/17571774221127695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cresswell JW, Plano Clarke VL. (2011) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage.

LinkOut - more resources