Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 24;4(3):100264.
doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 May.

Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts

Affiliations
Review

Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts

Sarah A Mullen et al. JID Innov. .

Abstract

Intralesional therapies are used for recalcitrant warts, but no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment exists nor is there consensus regarding the most efficacious therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize efficacy and adverse events reported in 62 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. The most studied intralesional therapies included measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine (n = 24 studies), purified protein derivative (PPD) (n = 19 studies), vitamin D3 (n = 15 studies), and Candida antigen (n = 14 studies). Most studies included adult and pediatric patients or adults alone, with only 4 studies on pediatric patients alone. MMR vaccine was the most studied treatment (n = 853 patients). MMR had a complete response rate of 27-90%. The next most common treatment, PPD, had a complete response rate of 45-87%. Other treatments included Candida antigen and vitamin D3, with complete response rates of 25-84% and 40-96%, respectively. The most frequent side effects were injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. This systematic review represents a useful summary of intralesional therapy RCTs for clinician reference. This study also highlights the lack of large multi-institutional RCTs, despite many patients being treated for this widespread problem.

Keywords: Cutaneous warts; Intralesional therapy; Systematic review; Verruca; Wart.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Diagram. PRISMA diagram defines our final studies included. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abd El-Magiud E.M., Abd El-Samea G.M., Gaber H.D. Intralesional injection of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine versus cryotherapy in treatment of warts: a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33 - PubMed
    1. Abd-Elazeim F.M., Mohammed G.F.A., Fathy A., Mohamed R.W. Evaluation of IL-12 serum level in patients with recalcitrant multiple common warts, treated by intralesional tuberculin antigen. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014;25:264–267. - PubMed
    1. Adalatkhah H., Khalilollahi H., Amini N., Sadeghi-Bazargani H. Compared therapeutic efficacy between intralesional bleomycin and cryotherapy for common warts: a randomized clinical trial. Dermatol Online J. 2007;13:4. - PubMed
    1. Agrawal C., Vyas K., Mittal A., Khare A.K., Gupta L.K. A Randomized double Blind Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy of intralesional MMR Vaccine with Normal Saline in the Treatment of cutaneous Warts. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2018;9:389–393. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Bhadbhade S.P., Noojibail B., Shetty S.M., Varghese A. Comparative study in efficacy and safety of intralesional injections of vitamin D3, measles rubella (MR) vaccine, and purified protein derivative (PPD) in the management of cutaneous warts. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2020;13:326–332. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources