Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 22:11:1364940.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1364940. eCollection 2024.

The clinical use of remote parameter testing during cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation procedures: a single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Affiliations

The clinical use of remote parameter testing during cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation procedures: a single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Shiqiang Xiong et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: A novel non-contact system for remote parameter testing and reprogramming offers an alternative method for assessing device parameters during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation without the need for physical contact with the manufacturer's clinical service technician. The safety and feasibility of using this system in CIEDs implantation procedures remains to be determined.

Objective: Evaluate the safety and feasibility of remote parameter testing in CIEDs implantation procedures.

Methods: A single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial (ChiCTR2200057587) was conducted to compare the two approaches for interrogating CIEDs during implantation procedures: routine interrogation performed by on-site technicians or remote interrogation performed by technicians using the 5G-Cloud Technology Platform. Patients aged ≥18 years and elected to receive CIEDs were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of the parameter test. Safety and efficiency were evaluated in all randomly assigned participants.

Results: A total of 480 patients were finally enrolled and were randomly assigned to routine group (n = 240) or remote group (n = 240). The primary endpoint was achieved by 100% in both groups (P = 0.0060 for noninferiority). The parameters of sensing, threshold, and impedance regarding the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle had no statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05). Procedure time, parameter testing time, and both duration and dose of x-ray irradiation were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Shut-open door frequency was significantly higher in the routine group than the remote group [6.00 (4.00, 8.00) vs. 0, P < 0.0001]. Notably, no clinical or technical complications were observed in the remote group.

Conclusions: Remote parameter testing is safe and feasible across various devices implantation procedures. The utilization of remote parameter testing and reprogramming could represent an innovative approach to improve healthcare accessibility and unlock the full potential of secondary centers in managing CIEDs.

The registration identification: ChiCTR2200057587.

Keywords: COVID-19; cardiac implantable electronic devices; implantation; remote interrogation; remote reprogramming; remote testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of the utilization of the 5G-cloud technology platform for remote parameter testing. The 5G-cloud technology platform for remote parameter testing, consisting of a 5G remote support terminal connected to the programmer externally, a PAD equipped with a 5G-cloud follow-up application, and a cloud-based remote service system. The 5G remote support terminal connects directly to the 5G-cloud follow-up application via the internet. No network or software is required for the on-site programmer. Remote control of the on-site programmer can be realized by simply connecting to the 5G remote support terminal and using simulated mouse and keyboard information. No direct data interact between the computer and the on-site programmer. This system enables clinical device technicians to provide real-time remote parameter testing and reprogramming for cardiac implantable electronic devices in primary medical and healthcare institutions lacking device specialists.

Similar articles

References

    1. Slotwiner D, Varma N, Akar JG, Annas G, Beardsall M, Fogel RI, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. (2015) 12:e69–100. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng CD, Zhao S, Jiang J, Lin N, Li P, Ning XH, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in China: insights from 2 years of changing pandemic conditions. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:1031241. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1031241 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwab JO, Wiese J, Hauser T. The influence of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on the implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Germany: changes between 2020 Q1–Q3 and 2019 Q1–Q3. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. (2022) 8:104–12. 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab091 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tovia-Brodie O, Rav Acha M, Belhassen B, Gasperetti A, Schiavone M, Forleo GB, et al. Implantation of cardiac electronic devices in active COVID-19 patients: results from an international survey. Heart Rhythm. (2022) 19:206–16. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.10.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbelo E, Angera I, Trucco E, Rivas-Gándara N, Guerra JM, Bisbal F, et al. Reduction in new cardiac electronic device implantations in catalonia during COVID-19. Europace. (2021) 23:456–63. 10.1093/europace/euab011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed