Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 11;149(24):1875-1884.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069291. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Effect of Alcohol-Mediated Renal Denervation on Blood Pressure in the Presence of Antihypertensive Medications: Primary Results From the TARGET BP I Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Alcohol-Mediated Renal Denervation on Blood Pressure in the Presence of Antihypertensive Medications: Primary Results From the TARGET BP I Randomized Clinical Trial

David E Kandzari et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) has demonstrated clinically relevant reductions in blood pressure (BP) among individuals with uncontrolled hypertension despite lifestyle intervention and medications. The safety and effectiveness of alcohol-mediated RDN have not been formally studied in this indication.

Methods: TARGET BP I is a prospective, international, sham-controlled, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded trial investigating the safety and efficacy of alcohol-mediated RDN. Patients with office systolic BP (SBP) ≥150 and ≤180 mm Hg, office diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, and mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP ≥135 and ≤170 mm Hg despite prescription of 2 to 5 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary end point was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP 3 months after the procedure. Secondary end points included mean between-group differences in office and ambulatory BP at additional time points.

Results: Among 301 patients randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control, RDN was associated with a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP at 3 months (mean±SD, -10.0±14.2 mm Hg versus -6.8±12.1 mm Hg; treatment difference, -3.2 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.3 to 0.0]; P=0.0487). Subgroup analysis of the primary end point revealed no significant interaction across predefined subgroups. At 3 months, the mean change in office SBP was -12.7±18.3 and -9.7±17.3 mm Hg (difference, -3.0 [95% CI, -7.0 to 1.0]; P=0.173) for RDN and sham, respectively. No significant differences in ambulatory or office diastolic BP were observed. Adverse safety events through 6 months were uncommon, with one instance of accessory renal artery dissection in the RDN group (0.7%). No significant between-group differences in medication changes or patient adherence were identified.

Conclusions: Alcohol-mediated RDN was associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP compared with sham control. No significant differences between groups in office BP or 6-month major adverse events were observed.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02910414.

Keywords: alcohols; antihypertensive agents; denervation; hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures Dr Kandzari received institutional research/grant support and support for attending meetings from Medtronic and Ablative Solutions Inc, personal consulting honoraria from Medtronic and HyperQure, and has equity in BioStar (none related to Ablative Solutions Inc). Dr Wever received consulting fees from Medtronic, ReCor, Ablative Solutions Inc, Johnson & Johnson, and Urovant. Dr Pathak received consulting fees from Medtronic, Merck, Servier, and Ablative Solutions and speaker honoraria/support for attending meetings from Ablative Solutions, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Omron, ReCor Medical, Recordati, and Servier. He is a board member of the European Society of Hypertension, is a past president of the French Society of Cardiology, and is president-elect of the French Foundation for Research in Hypertension. Dr Zidar received study fees to the institution for enrolled patients from North Carolina Heart & Vascular research and consulting fees from Cordis Corp. M. Saxena received institutional grants from Ablative Solutions, ReCor Medical, Applied Therapeutics, and MSD, as well as consulting fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Mineralys, BI, ReCor Medical, Esperion, and Vifor Pharma. Dr David is a consultant for the Medtronic structural heart program. Dr Schmieder received grants, consulting fees, and honoraria from Ablative Solutions, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical. Dr Langer is an unpaid speaker of the Radial Working Group of the German Society of Cardiology. Dr Persu received grants from Servier and ReCor Medical, speaker honoraria from Servier, ReCor, Medical, and Sanofi, has participated on advisory boards for ReCor Medical, and received equipment and medical writing support from Ablative Solutions Inc. Dr Fischell possesses the license of patents and potential royalties with stock options in Ablative Solutions Inc and is the chief medical officer of Ablative Solutions Inc. Dr Persu receives institutional/grant support, personal consulting fees, and support for attending meetings/travel from Ablative Solutions, Inc. Dr Mendelsohn is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219), and Deutsche Herzstiftung. His institution (Saarland University) has received scientific support from Ablative Solutions, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical. He received speaker honoraria/consulting fees from Ablative Solutions, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inari, Medtronic, Merck, ReCor Medical, Servier, and Terumo. The other authors report no conflicts.

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data