Expression of netrin-1 in uterine serous carcinoma and its association with prognosis
- PMID: 38588254
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15513
Expression of netrin-1 in uterine serous carcinoma and its association with prognosis
Abstract
Background/objectives: At present, there are few biomarkers used to predict the prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Netrin-1 may be a promising biomarker candidate. We investigated netrin-1 expression in USC tissues and healthy endometrial tissues to determine its relevance to disease prognosis.
Materials and methods: Netrin-1 expression was examined in the tissues of 48 patients with USC and 30 patients with healthy benign endometrial tissues via immunohistochemistry.
Results: None of the healthy tissues were stained with netrin-1. In tumor tissues, the overall positivity rate of netrin-1 was 75%, detected as high expression in 17 patients (35%) and low in 19 (40%). Patients who had tumors with no netrin-1 expression (n = 12) had a median overall survival (OS) of 60.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 47-98), whereas patients who had tumors with low to strong netrin-1 expression (n = 33) had a lower median OS of 50 months, but the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI, 58-108; P = 0.531). Disease-free survival (DFS) was not statistically significant between the groups (95% CI, 67.7-115.9; P = 0.566). Patients with a tumor diameter ≥2 cm had higher netrin-1 expression than those with a tumor diameter of 2 cm (P = 0.027). We did not find any difference in overall and DFS when age, tumor stage, histology, tumor diameter, p53 status, lymphovascular space invasion, myometrial invasion, and lymph node metastasis were compared according to netrin-1 expression (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Netrin-1 was expressed in USC but not in healthy tissues. Its expression was not associated with OS or DFS.
Keywords: biomarker; immunohistochemistry; netrin‐1; prognosis; uterine serous carcinoma.
© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global CancerObservatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research onCancer. 2024. Accessed April 4, 2024. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en
-
- Bogani G, Ray‐Coquard I, Concin N, et al. Uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(1):226‐234.
-
- Ferriss JS, Erickson BK, Shih IM, Fader AN. Uterine serous carcinoma: key advances and novel treatment approaches. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(8):1165‐1174.
-
- McGunigal M, Liu J, Kalir T, Chadha M, Gupta V. Survival differences among uterine papillary serous, clear cell and grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma endometrial cancers: a national cancer database analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(1):85‐92.
-
- Fader AN, Boruta DM, Olawaiye AB, Gehrig PA. Uterine papillary serous cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;22:21‐29.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous