Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 29;12(2):e2300388.
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00388. Print 2024 Apr 29.

Couple-Years of Protection Indicator: New Global Guidance for Updating Existing Methods and Adding New Methods

Affiliations
Review

Couple-Years of Protection Indicator: New Global Guidance for Updating Existing Methods and Adding New Methods

Elena Lebetkin et al. Glob Health Sci Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Couple-years of protection (CYP) is an indicator that allows for monitoring and evaluating of family planning (FP) program performance through simple calculations. The CYP for each contraceptive method is calculated by multiplying the number of contraceptive commodity units distributed to clients over a 1-year period by a conversion factor that quantifies the duration of contraceptive protection provided per unit distributed. CYP calculations across methods were previously updated in 2000 and 2011, resulting in changes in methodology, factor inclusion, and specific methods. Since the 2011 update, changes and additions to the modern contraceptive method mix required new CYP conversion factors for 4 methods of contraception: Levoplant implant, progestin-only pills (POPs), Caya diaphragm, and the hormonal intrauterine device.

Methods: We conducted literature reviews of both published and gray literature and consulted with experts to identify updated data on continuation rates, duration of efficacy, and method effectiveness for the 4 methods. New CYP conversion factors were calculated for the 4 methods either by using the same calculation used previously for the method considering new data or, for new methods, using calculations for similar methods.

Results: New CYP conversion factors were assigned to the 4 methods of contraception covered in this update: Levoplant, 2.5 CYP per implant inserted; POPs, 0.0833 CYP per pack (i.e., 12 cycles per CYP); Caya diaphragm, 1 CYP per device, and hormonal intrauterine device, 4.8 CYP per device inserted.

Conclusions: CYP is an important indicator for FP programs. As new methods of contraception are developed and new evidence is generated for current methods, the indicator may need to be updated. A standard process for updating and documenting future CYP updates is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Flowchart to Determine if Couple-Years of Protection Update Is Needed Abbreviations: CYP, couple-years of protection; LMIC, low- and middle-income country.

Similar articles

  • [CYP (couple years of protection): an excellent programmatic indicator that needs refinement].
    Trias M. Trias M. Profamilia. 1991 Dec;7(18):3-7. Profamilia. 1991. PMID: 12284751 Spanish.
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.
  • More evils of CYP.
    Fort AL. Fort AL. Stud Fam Plann. 1996 Jul-Aug;27(4):228-31. Stud Fam Plann. 1996. PMID: 8875735
  • Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.
    Mack N, Crawford TJ, Guise JM, Chen M, Grey TW, Feldblum PJ, Stockton LL, Gallo MF. Mack N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31013349 Free PMC article.

Cited by

References

    1. Wishik SM, Chen K. Couple-years of protection a measure of family planning program output. Manual for evaluation of family planning and population programs, number 7. International Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction, Columbia University;1973.
    1. Data for Impact. Family Planning and Reproductive Health Indicators Database. Accessed March 20, 2024. https://www.data4impactproject.org/prh/family-planning/
    1. Steiner M, Sonneveldt E, Lebetkin E, Jallow F. Updated Couple Years of Protection: Literature Review, Guidance for Updating Existing Methods, and Adding New Methods. January 11, 2022. Accessed March 20, 2024. https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/resource-cyp-... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stover J, Bertrand JT, Shelton JD. Empirically based conversion factors for calculating couple-years of protection. Eval Rev. 2000;24(1):3–46. 10.1177/0193841X0002400101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The RESPOND Project. New Developments in the Calculation and Use of Couple-Years of Protection (CYP) and Their Implications for the Evaluation of Family Planning Programs—Meeting Highlights. The RESPOND Project/EngenderHealth;2011. Accessed March 20, 2024. https://www.engenderhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/imported-files/respond...

Publication types