Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;30(5):1416-1423.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02917-8. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Maternal diabetes and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring in a multinational cohort of 3.6 million mother-child pairs

Affiliations

Maternal diabetes and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring in a multinational cohort of 3.6 million mother-child pairs

Adrienne Y L Chan et al. Nat Med. 2024 May.

Abstract

Previous studies report an association between maternal diabetes mellitus (MDM) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), often overlooking unmeasured confounders such as shared genetics and environmental factors. We therefore conducted a multinational cohort study with linked mother-child pairs data in Hong Kong, New Zealand, Taiwan, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden to evaluate associations between different MDM (any MDM, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM)) and ADHD using Cox proportional hazards regression. We included over 3.6 million mother-child pairs between 2001 and 2014 with follow-up until 2020. Children who were born to mothers with any type of diabetes during pregnancy had a higher risk of ADHD than unexposed children (pooled hazard ratio (HR) = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.24). Higher risks of ADHD were also observed for both GDM (pooled HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.17) and PGDM (pooled HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.25-1.55). However, siblings with discordant exposure to GDM in pregnancy had similar risks of ADHD (pooled HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.94-1.17), suggesting potential confounding by unmeasured, shared familial factors. Our findings indicate that there is a small-to-moderate association between MDM and ADHD, whereas the association between GDM and ADHD is unlikely to be causal. This finding contrast with previous studies, which reported substantially higher risk estimates, and underscores the need to reevaluate the precise roles of hyperglycemia and genetic factors in the relationship between MDM and ADHD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.H.Y.C. receives research funding from Health Research Council NZ, Oakley Mental Health Foundation, NZ Pharmacy Education and Research Foundation, Ministry of Health, World Health Organisation and is the recipient of fellowships from the Robert Irwin Foundation and Auckland Medical Research Foundation, unrelated to the submitted work. She is also affiliated with the Asthma UK Centre of Applied Research and is on the Board of Asthma NZ and Pharmacy Council of New Zealand. D.C. reports research funding outside the submitted work from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, speaker’s fees and honoraria from Novartis, Medice, Servier and Shire/Takeda and royalties from Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press in the past 3 years. M.G. and M.K.L. report that they received grants from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (Building an ecosystem for better monitoring and communicating the safety of medicines’ use in pregnancy and breastfeeding: validated and regulatory endorsed workflows for fast, optimized evidence generation, IMI ConcePTION, grant agreement number 821520) while conducting the study. J.H. receives research funding from the Health Research Council NZ, Lotteries Health Research (New Zealand), New Zealand Ministry of Health and New Zealand Health Quality Safety Commission unrelated to the submitted work. P.I. reports research funding from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, Health and Medical Research Fund and Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. Ø.K. reports participation in regulator-mandated post-authorization safety studies (PASS) of drugs with no relation to the work reported in this paper. The studies are funded by Leo Pharma and Novo Nordisk, with funds paid to the institution where he is employed (no personal fees). W.C.Y.L. reports research grants from Diabetes UK, AIR@InnoHK administered by Innovation and Technology Commission outside the submitted work. J.R. and C.E.C. are employees of the Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology at Karolinska Institutet, which receives funding from pharmaceutical companies and regulatory authorities for drug safety/utilization studies, unrelated to the submitted work. E.S. receives research funding from the UK National Institute of Health Research, United Kingdom Research and Innovation, and the European Innovative Medicines Initiative. E.C.-C.L. reports research funding outside the submitted work from Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, Roche, IQVIA. H.Z. was supported by a UNSW Scientia Program Award and reports grants from the European Union Horizon 2020, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Icelandic Centre for Research, NordForsk Nordic Council of Ministers during the conduct of this study. K.K.C.M. is the recipient of the CW Maplethorpe Fellowship, reports grants from the European Union Horizon 2020, the UK National Institute of Health Research and the Hong Kong Research Grant Council, Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission, and reports personal fees from IQVIA unrelated to the submitted work. I.C.K.W. received research grants from Amgen, Janssen, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer and Bristol-Myers Squibb and Takeda, Institute for Health Research in England, European Commission, National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia, The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, Research Grants Council Hong Kong and Health and Medical Research Fund Hong Kong; consulting fees from IQVIA and World Health Organization; payment for expert testimony for Appeal Court in Hong Kong; serves on advisory committees for Member of Pharmacy and Poisons Board; is a member of the Expert Committee on Clinical Events Assessment Following COVID-19 Immunization; is a member of the Advisory Panel on COVID-19 Vaccines of the Hong Kong Government; is the non-executive director of Jacobson Medical in Hong Kong; and is the founder and director of Therakind Limited (UK), Advance Data Analytics for Medical Science (ADAMS) Limited (HK), Asia Medicine Regulatory Affairs (AMERA) Services Limited and OCUS Innovation Limited (HK, Ireland and UK). A.Y.L.C. is supported by the AIR@innoHK programme of the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission. L.G., M.H.-C.H., L.J.K., R.A., T.B., J.M.C., W.C.L., T.-C.L., S.-C.S., K.C.B.T., K.T. and A.T. declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Illustration of cohort inclusion and pregnancy periods.
aThe earliest date of mothers’ health data in each data source. bBaseline conditions included: demographics, maternal conditions and medication use. For HK analysis, maternal age at delivery and birth year were assessed at the date of delivery, body mass index (BMI) was assessed from LMP − 365 days to LMP − 1 day and all other covariates were assessed before LMP; for analysis in Nordic countries and New Zealand, medication use was assessed from LMP − 365 days to LMP − 1 day, and diagnoses were assessed from LMP − 365 days to delivery date; for Taiwan analysis, all covariates were assessed within 2 years before the date of delivery. cExposure window: (1) Period before pregnancy, (2) first trimester: LMP to LMP + 90 days, (3) second trimester: LMP + 91 days to LMP + 180 days, and (4) third trimester: LMP + 181 days to delivery date. dEarliest of: date of ADHD diagnosis, date of first ADHD medication prescription, date of death, end of database catchment period.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Flowchart of cohort identification.
aNot applicable to Finland data, where residence/migration data are not available. bIndividuals could fulfill more than one exclusion criteria.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Meta-analyses of maternal diabetes and the risk of ADHD in offspring.
Data are presented as HRs and 95% CIs, which were adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, birth year, multifetal pregnancies, maternal conditions and use of relevant medications using Cox proportional hazard regression, with a significance level of 5% for a two-sided test. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. df, degrees of freedom; IV, inverse variance; s.e., standard error; T1DM, type 1 pregestational diabetes; T2DM, type 2 pregestational diabetes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Meta-analyses of discordant GDM exposure in siblings and the risk of ADHD.
Data are presented as HRs and 95% CIs, which were adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, birth year, multifetal pregnancies, maternal conditions and use of relevant medications using Cox proportional hazard regression, with a significance level of 5% for a two-sided test.
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Sample size and power considerations.
Notes: Results are rounded up to the nearest integer. Abbreviations: CC, continuity correction.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2. General definition of exposure groups.
Abbreviations: GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; MDM, maternal diabetes mellitus; PGDM, pregestational diabetes mellitus.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 3. Cumulative incidence of ADHD in different comparison groups from the main analyses.
Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; MDM, maternal diabetes mellitus.
Extended Data Fig. 4
Extended Data Fig. 4. Results of comparisons between different MDM types.
Notes: Data are presented as hazard ratios and 95% CIs, which were adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, birth year, multifoetal pregnancies, maternal conditions and use of relevant medications using Cox proportional hazard regression, with a significance level of 5% for a two-sided test. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; IV, inverse variance; MDM, maternal diabetes mellitus; PGDM, pregestational diabetes mellitus; T1DM, type 1 pregestational diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 pregestational diabetes mellitus; SE, standard error.
Extended Data Fig. 5
Extended Data Fig. 5. Directed acyclic graph related to the analyses.
Notes: * including diagnosis or medication prescription; psychiatric and neurological conditions: including ASD, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, depression, disorders of psychological development, epilepsy, illicit drug use, intellectual disability, personality disorders, schizophrenia, sleep disorders; other chronic medical conditions: including cluster headache, crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, hypertension, migraine or other headaches, polycystic ovary syndrome, renal disease, rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory polyarthropathies, thyroid disorders; Medications for psychiatric and neurological conditions: including antihypertensives, antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, antiparkinson drugs, anxiolytics, sedatives, opioids, triptans; socioeconomic status: defined by income level, birth institution or maternal education according to each data source.

References

    1. Cho NH, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018;138:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuen L, et al. Projections of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in 2019 and beyond: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019;157:107841. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107841. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Djelmis J, et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus according to IADPSG and NICE criteria. Int J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2016;135:250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lavery JA, Friedman AM, Keyes KM, Wright JD, Ananth CV. Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal changes in prevalence rates between 1979 and 2010. BJOG. 2017;124:804–813. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14236. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexopoulos AS, Blair R, Peters AL. Management of preexisting diabetes in pregnancy: a review. JAMA. 2019;321:1811–1819. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4981. - DOI - PMC - PubMed