Bringing Barley Back: Analysis of Heritage Varieties for Use as Germplasm Sources to Improve Resistance against the Most Devastating, Contemporary Disease in Canada, Fusarium Head Blight (Fusarium graminearum)
- PMID: 38592826
- PMCID: PMC10974673
- DOI: 10.3390/plants13060799
Bringing Barley Back: Analysis of Heritage Varieties for Use as Germplasm Sources to Improve Resistance against the Most Devastating, Contemporary Disease in Canada, Fusarium Head Blight (Fusarium graminearum)
Abstract
Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium graminearum, is currently the most devastating disease for barley (Hordeum vulgare) in Canada. Associated mycotoxins can compromise grain quality, where deoxynivalenol (DON) is considered particularly damaging due to its frequency of detection. Breeding barley with a lower DON content is difficult, due to the poor adaptation and malt quality of resistance sources. A set of European-derived heritage varieties were screened in an FHB nursery in Charlottetown, PE, with selections tested at Brandon, MB, between 2018-2022. Genetic evaluation demonstrated a distinct clustering of Canadian varieties from the heritage set. At Brandon, 72% of the heritage varieties ranked lower for DON content than did the moderately resistant Canadian check 'AAC Goldman', but resistance was associated with later heading and taller stature. In contrast with Canadian modern malting variety 'AAC Synergy', general deficiencies were observed in yield, enzyme activity, and extract, along with higher protein content. Nonetheless, several resistant varieties were identified with reasonable a heading date and yield, including 'Chevallier Chile', 'Domen', 'Djugay', 'Hannchen', 'Heils Franken', 'Moravian Barley', 'Loosdorfer' with 'Golden Melon', 'Nutans Moskva', and 'Vellavia', these being some of the most promising varieties when malting quality characteristics were also considered. These heritage resources could be used as parents in breeding to develop FHB-resistant malting barley varieties.
Keywords: barley; deoxynivalenol; fusarium head blight; germplasm resources.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Deoxynivalenol-3-Glucoside Content Is Highly Associated with Deoxynivalenol Levels in Two-Row Barley Genotypes of Importance to Canadian Barley Breeding Programs.Toxins (Basel). 2019 Jun 5;11(6):319. doi: 10.3390/toxins11060319. Toxins (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31195591 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence and impact of Fusarium head blight pathogens and mycotoxins on malting barley quality in UK.Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Jun 2;179(100):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 24727381 Free PMC article.
-
Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol Accumulation in Virginia Barley.Plant Dis. 2012 Feb;96(2):279-284. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-11-0551. Plant Dis. 2012. PMID: 30731796
-
Fusarium Head Blight in Durum Wheat: Recent Status, Breeding Directions, and Future Research Prospects.Phytopathology. 2019 Oct;109(10):1664-1675. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-19-0095-RVW. Epub 2019 Sep 3. Phytopathology. 2019. PMID: 31369363 Review.
-
Management and resistance in wheat and barley to fusarium head blight.Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:135-61. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140340. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004. PMID: 15283663 Review.
References
-
- Stack R.W. History of Fusarium head blight with emphasis on North America. In: Leonard K.J., Bushnell W.R., editors. Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat and Barley. The American Phytopathological Society; St. Paul, MN, USA: 2003. pp. 1–34.
-
- Tekauz A., McCallum B., Gilbert J. Review: Fusarium head blight of barley in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2000;22:9–16. doi: 10.1080/07060660009501156. - DOI
-
- Wilson W., Dahl B., Nganje W. Economic costs of Fusarium head blight, scab and deoxynivalenol. World Mycotoxin J. 2018;11:291–302. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2017.2204. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous