Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Aug 15;210(4):378-380.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202403-0603ED.

The Analysis of Proteomics by Machine Learning in Separating Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis from Connective Tissue Disease-Interstitial Lung Disease

Affiliations
Editorial

The Analysis of Proteomics by Machine Learning in Separating Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis from Connective Tissue Disease-Interstitial Lung Disease

Yuben Moodley. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) The schematic of the study. The PFF cohort constituted the training set, which underwent random subsampling and recursive feature elimination to obtain a 37-protein signature. These 37 proteins were subjected to ML analysis from the UVA/Chicago classification cohorts and the RECITAL (Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide in Connective Tissue Disease–ILD)/UC-Davis prediction cohorts. (B) Proportion of patients with different composite diagnosis scores (CDSs). Patients with CDSs of 0 or 1 were classified as CTD–ILD, those with CDSs of 2 were unclassified, and those with CDSs of 3 or 4 were classified as IPF. CTD = connective tissue disease; ILD = interstitial lung disease; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; LASSO = least absolute shrinkage selection operator; PFF = Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation; RF = random forest; UC-Davis = University of California, Davis; UVA = University of Virginia.

Comment on

References

    1. Rashidi HH, Tran NK, Betts EV, Howell LP, Green R. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in pathology: the present landscape of supervised methods. Acad Pathol . 2019;6:2374289519873088. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan J, Hofmanninger J, Nenning KH, Prayer F, Röhrich S, Sverzellati N, et al. Unsupervised machine learning identifies predictive progression markers of IPF. Eur Radiol . 2023;33:925–935. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh SLF, Mackintosh JA, Calandriello L, Silva M, Sverzellati N, Larici AR, et al. Deep learning-based outcome prediction in progressive fibrotic lung disease using high-resolution computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2022;206:883–891. - PubMed
    1. Huang Y, Ma SF, Oldham JM, Adegunsoye A, Zhu D, Murray S, et al. Machine learning of plasma proteomics classifies diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2024;210 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang BR, Edwards R, Freiheit EA, Ma Y, Burg C, de Andrade J, et al. The Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry: rationale, design, and methods. Ann Am Thorac Soc . 2020;17:1620–1628. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources