Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 16;5(4):101506.
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101506. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Harnessing artificial intelligence for prostate cancer management

Affiliations
Review

Harnessing artificial intelligence for prostate cancer management

Lingxuan Zhu et al. Cell Rep Med. .

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy in males. The pathology review of PCa is crucial for clinical decision-making, but traditional pathology review is labor intensive and subjective to some extent. Digital pathology and whole-slide imaging enable the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in pathology. This review highlights the success of AI in detecting and grading PCa, predicting patient outcomes, and identifying molecular subtypes. We propose that AI-based methods could collaborate with pathologists to reduce workload and assist clinicians in formulating treatment recommendations. We also introduce the general process and challenges in developing AI pathology models for PCa. Importantly, we summarize publicly available datasets and open-source codes to facilitate the utilization of existing data and the comparison of the performance of different models to improve future studies.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; machine learning; pathology; prostate cancer; whole-slide image.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
The development process of pathology AI models, using automated Gleason grading as an example
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interaction between pathology AI models and pathologists

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Han W., Johnson C., Gaed M., Gómez J.A., Moussa M., Chin J.L., Pautler S., Bauman G.S., Ward A.D. Histologic tissue components provide major cues for machine learning-based prostate cancer detection and grading on prostatectomy specimens. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:9911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66849-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eichler K., Hempel S., Wilby J., Myers L., Bachmann L.M., Kleijnen J. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J. Urol. 2006;175:1605–1612. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00957-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng L., MacLennan G.T., Bostwick D.G. Fourth edition. Elsevier; 2020. Urologic Surgical Pathology.
    1. Ozkan T.A., Eruyar A.T., Cebeci O.O., Memik O., Ozcan L., Kuskonmaz I. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer. Scand. J. Urol. 2016;50:420–424. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1206619. - DOI - PubMed