Evaluation of Cervical Vertebral Motion and Foraminal Changes During the Spurling Test Using Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography-Based Micromotion Analysis
- PMID: 38595107
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005010
Evaluation of Cervical Vertebral Motion and Foraminal Changes During the Spurling Test Using Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography-Based Micromotion Analysis
Abstract
Study design: Clinical experimental diagnostic study.
Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate cervical spine dynamics including changes in the cervical foramina in patients experiencing intermittent arm radiculopathy.
Background: Cervical foraminal stenosis is a frequent cause of radicular arm pain. The Spurling test, while specific, lacks the precision to identify symptomatic nerve roots. The relationship among vertebral motion, foraminal changes, and radiculopathy during a Spurling test remains underexplored.
Patients and methods: Ten patients with positive Spurling tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed 1 or 2-level cervical foraminal stenosis were scanned using the Dynamic MRI Compression System enabling a simulated Spurling test inside the MRI gantry of a 3T MRI scanner with a dedicated neck coil. First, a relaxed image acquisition was undertaken, followed by slowly applying the Spurling test until the patient reported aggravation of radiculopathy or discomfort, where the next image series was taken. Zero echo time MRI was employed to obtain computed tomography (CT)-like images. The images were thereafter analyzed using the Sectra® CT-based Micromotion Analysis software for motion analysis.
Results: The C4/C5 level exhibited the most significant movements both in translation and rotation, with less movements observed in C5 to C6 and C6 to C7 levels. No uniform pattern emerged that differentiated suspected stenotic levels from nonsuspected levels. Despite relatively small vertebral movements, 9/10 of patients reported arm pain during provocation, indicating extremely narrow margins of tolerance.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of zero echo time MRI and CT-based Micromotion Analysis in detecting subtle yet clinically relevant vertebral motions influencing the foramina in the cervical spine during the Spurling maneuver. These findings could lead to a better understanding and potentially improved diagnostic strategies for cervical foraminal stenosis, although further research with a larger cohort is necessary to confirm these results.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
J.H., H.H., K.L., and H.B. have partial ownership in patent holding company of the DMRICS compressive device. The remaining author reports no conflicts of interest..
Similar articles
-
MRI evaluation of foraminal changes in the cervical spine with assistance of a novel compression device.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 17;13(1):11508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38401-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37460649 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of osseous cervical foraminal stenosis in spinal radiculopathy using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1855-1862. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5769-4. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30324384
-
Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.Spine J. 2018 Apr;18(4):575-583. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.248. Epub 2017 Sep 4. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28882520
-
Pediatric cervical kyphosis in the MRI era (1984-2008) with long-term follow up: literature review.Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Feb;38(2):361-377. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05409-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022. PMID: 34806157 Review.
-
C5 palsy following posterior decompression and instrumentation in cervical stenosis: Single center experience and review.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;174:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30195898 Review.
References
-
- Holck P. Anatomy of the cervical spine. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130:29–32.
-
- Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, et al. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care. 2020;18:555–67.
-
- Abbed KM, Coumans JV. Cervical radiculopathy: pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(supp1 1):S28–S34.
-
- Spurling S. Lateral rupture of the cervical intervertebral discs. A common cause of shoulder and arm pain. Surg Gynec Obstet. 1944;78:350–8.
-
- Thoomes EJ, van Geest S, van der Windt DA, et al. Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Spine J. 2018;18:179–89.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous