Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S733-S735.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_978_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Sealing Ability Comparison of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin-An In Vitro Stereomicroscopic Study

Affiliations

Sealing Ability Comparison of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin-An In Vitro Stereomicroscopic Study

Mohammed Khwaja Moinuddin et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Different obturation techniques are being used to improve canal sealing, thereby minimizing marginal leakage.

Aims and objectives: To evaluate the marginal leakage of three different obturating materials and techniques using stereomicroscope.

Materials and methods: Thirty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and were divided into three groups of 10 each for which the biomechanical preparation was done. The teeth were divided into three experimental groups according to the obturation material and technique used, Group I: gutta-percha with AH Plus root canal sealer (lateral condensation): Group II: thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique-non-carrier-based (calamus) with AH Plus sealer (backfill): Group III: C point (self-sealing root canal obturating system) with bioceramic sealer (single cone). Each specimen was subjected for testing apical sealing ability. The values of microleakage associated with different root canal sealers were evaluated using a stereomicroscope.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of apical dye penetration/leakage among all the three groups (P = 0.091), whereas Group I showed a higher degree of apical leakage than the other techniques tested.

Conclusion: None of the tested filling materials provided a gap-free or void-free root canal filling; however, thermoplasticized gutta-percha is used with AH Plus sealer exhibited less voids and gaps when compared to other tested materials.

Keywords: Gutta-percha; microleakage; root canal sealer apical sealing ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Graph 1
Graph 1
Bar graph representation of mean apical dye penetration among three groups

References

    1. Didato A, Eid AA, Levin MD, Khan S, Tay FR, Rueggeberg FA. Time-based lateral hygroscopic expansion of a water-expandable endodontic obturation point. J Dent. 2013;41:796–801. - PubMed
    1. Arora S. Comparative evaluation of novel smart seal system and its homogeneity of using CBCT: An Invitro simulated lateral canal study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:364–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verissimo DM. Methodologies for assessment of apical and coronal leakage of endodontic filling materials. J Oral Sci. 2006;48:393–8. - PubMed
    1. Pawar SS. Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of Bioceramic sealer AH plus and Epiphany: An Invitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:579–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tyagi S. Evolution of root canal sealers: An insight story. Eur J Gen Dent. 2013;2:199–218.