Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;17(2):329-336.
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.329-336. Epub 2024 Feb 7.

Circulation of foot-and-mouth disease serotypes, risk factors, and their effect on hematological and biochemical profiles among cattle and buffalo in Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan

Affiliations

Circulation of foot-and-mouth disease serotypes, risk factors, and their effect on hematological and biochemical profiles among cattle and buffalo in Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan

Daud Khan et al. Vet World. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background and aim: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an infectious disease of cloven-hoofed animals, including buffalo, cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs, causing major economic losses to the local farmers and, overall, to the national economy of the country. This study aimed to detect FMDV serotypes in year-round FMD outbreaks, hematological and biochemical changes, and oxidative stress in FMDV-infected cattle and buffaloes in the district of Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan, and the socioeconomic impact of FMD outbreaks on farmers.

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the district of Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan, where FMD virus (FMDV) serotypes were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Hematological, biochemical, and oxidative analyses were performed by analyzing the blood of FMDV-infected and non-infected animals. Information on the associated risk factors was obtained through a structured questionnaire by interviewing farmers in each FMD-affected farm.

Results: Thirty-four out of 38 farms (89%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 75%-97%) were positive for FMD by ELISA. Higher FMD infection was detected in farms with a herd size of <50 animals (50%, 17/34), followed by >100 animals (32%, 11/34) and 51-100 animals (18%, 6/34). Fifty-seven percent (114/200, 95% CI: 50%-64%) of animals were positive for FMD. Of these, 61% (69/114) were cattle and 39% (45/114) were buffalo. FMD positivity was higher in females (86%, 98/114) than in males (14%, 16/114) and higher in animals older than 2 years of age (52%, 59/114). On average, farmers lose U.S. dollars 3000 annually due to FMD outbreaks. Animals infected with FMDV had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) white blood cell counts and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower hemoglobin and total protein concentrations in buffalo and cattle, whereas infected cattle showed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower albumin levels. Globulin levels were lower in buffaloes infected. Alanine aminotransferase levels were lower in infected cattle (p ≤ 0.05). Creatinine levels were higher in infected buffalo (p ≤ 0.05). Urea and phosphorus concentrations were higher in FMDV-infected cattle and buffalo (p ≤ 0.05). Calcium levels were lower in infected cattle and buffalo (p ≤ 0.05). Catalase enzyme activity in infected cattle and buffaloes was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Lipid peroxidation was significantly higher in FMDV-infected cattle and buffalo (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: This study confirmed serotype O circulation among cattle and buffalo in year-long FMD outbreaks in the Quetta District of Balochistan. Blood analysis identified a parameter deviated from the normal level due to FMDV infection. In addition, the outbreak of FMD has a significant negative economic impact on livestock farmers.

Keywords: Quetta; buffalo; cattle; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; foot-and-mouth disease; serotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure-1
Figure-1
Farms positive for foot-and-mouth disease with respect to herd size.
Figure-2
Figure-2
Cattle positive for foot-and-mouth disease from January to December 2021.
Figure-3
Figure-3
Buffalo positive for foot-and-mouth disease from January to December 2021.
Figure-4
Figure-4
Male and female positive for foot-and-mouth disease.
Figure-5
Figure-5
Animals positive for foot-and-mouth disease with respect to age groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brito B.P, Rodriguez L.L, Hammond J.M, Pinto J, Perez A.M. Review of the global distribution of foot?and?mouth disease virus from 2007 to 2014. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017;64(2):316–332. - PubMed
    1. Azeem A, Rashid I, Hassan M.M, Asad M, Kaukab G, Tehseen A, Aamir S. A review on foot-and-mouth disease in dairy animals, etiology, pathogenesis and clinical findings. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020;9(1):821–832.
    1. Belsham G.J, Kristensen T, Jackson T. Foot-and-mouth disease virus:Prospects for using knowledge of virus biology to improve control of this continuing global threat. Virus Res. 2020;281:197909. - PubMed
    1. Zahur A.B, Irshad H, Hussain M, Anjum R, Khan M.Q. Transboundary animal diseases in Pakistan. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B. 2006;53(S1):19–22.
    1. Anjum R, Hussain M, Zahoor A.B, Irshad H, Farooq U. Epidemiological analyses of foot-and-mouth disease in Pakistan. Econ. Surv. 2006;5:648–651.

LinkOut - more resources