Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 27:19:63-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.009. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Is the robotic revolution stunting surgical skills?

Affiliations

Is the robotic revolution stunting surgical skills?

Damien J Lazar et al. Surg Open Sci. .

Abstract

This perspective piece aims to examine the impact of the growing utilization of robotic platforms in general and minimally invasive surgery on surgical trainee experience, skill level, and comfort in performing general surgical and minimally invasive procedures following completion of training. We review current literature and explore the application of robotic surgery to surgical training, where minimum case thresholds and breadth distribution are well defined, and where development of surgical technique is historically gained through delicate tissue handling with haptic feedback rather than relying on visual feedback alone. We call for careful consideration as to how best to incorporate robotics in surgical training in order to embrace technological advances without endangering the surgical proficiency of the surgeons of tomorrow.

Key message: The large-scale incorporation of robotics into general and minimally invasive surgical training is something that most, if not all, trainees must grapple with in today's world, and the proportion of robotics is increasing. This shift may significantly negatively affect trainees in terms of surgical skill upon completion of training and must be approached with an appropriate degree of concern and thoughtfulness so as to protect the surgeons of tomorrow.

Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Robotics; Surgical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sheetz K.H., Claflin J., Dimick J.B. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1918911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911. Jan 3. [PMID: 31922557; PMCID: PMC6991252] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grössmann-Waniek N., Riegelnegg M., Gassner L., et al. Robot-assisted surgery in thoracic and visceral indications: an updated systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:1139–1150. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10670-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prabhu A.S., Carbonell A., Hope W., et al. Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(5):380–387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller B.T., Prabhu A.S., Petro C.C., et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia repair: 1- and 2-year outcomes from the RIVAL trial. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(1):723–728. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09320-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olavarria O.A., Bernardi K., Shah S.K., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;370:m2457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2457. Published 2020 Jul 14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources