Exploring the Utility of remimazolam in cesarean sections under general anesthesia: A preliminary retrospective analysis and Implications for future study
- PMID: 38596107
- PMCID: PMC11002043
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28485
Exploring the Utility of remimazolam in cesarean sections under general anesthesia: A preliminary retrospective analysis and Implications for future study
Abstract
Background: Remimazolam has recently been introduced as a maintenance agent for general anesthesia. However, the effect of remimazolam on peripartum prognosis has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol for uterotonic drugs following cesarean section.
Methods: The electronic medical records of 51 adult women who underwent elective cesarean sections by single obstetrician under general anesthesia were collected. Participants were categorized into two groups: the propofol group and the remimazolam group. General anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of propofol or remimazolam after delivery. The number of uterotonic drugs administered during the cesarean section, the estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay (LOS) after delivery were assessed.
Results: Of the 51 patients included in the study, 35 were in the propofol group and 16 in the remimazolam group. In the remimazolam group, five patients (31.3%, 5/16) received more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Conversely, in the propofol group, 19 patients (54.3%, 19/35) were injected with more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal positioning of the placenta (P = 0.079) and not using remimazolam (P = 0.100) were the most relevant factors associated with the increased use of uterotonics. There was no significant difference in EBL between the two groups. The use of remimazolam was clinically relevant with a shorter LOS (P = 0.059).
Conclusions: The use of remimazolam as a maintenance agent did not result in significantly higher use of intrapartum uterotonics compared to the use of propofol. These results cannot exclude all adverse effects of remimazolam during cesarean delivery. Further randomized controlled trials must be conducted to obtain high-quality evidence.
Keywords: Cesarean section; Obstetrical anesthesia; Postpartum hemorrhage; Remimazolam; Sevoflurane; Uterine contraction; Uterine inertia.
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia with remimazolam and target-controlled propofol in middle-aged and elderly patients: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jan 10;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-01974-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 36624371 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Effects of remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 May 9;103(17):1303-1309. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221121-02449. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023. PMID: 37150679 Chinese.
-
Effect of Remimazolam- versus Propofol-Based Total Intravenous General Anesthesia on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability for Major Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 5;60(3):432. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030432. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38541158 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of remimazolam and propofol about safety outcome indicators during general anesthesia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Jun;89(6):553-564. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17034-9. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023. PMID: 36852570
-
Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Dec;88(12):1035-1042. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16817-3. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022. PMID: 36326772
Cited by
-
Emergency cesarean section under general anesthesia using remimazolam in a pregnant woman with Fontan circulation : Case report with literature review.Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Feb;74(2):97-102. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01507-8. Epub 2025 Feb 13. Anaesthesiologie. 2025. PMID: 39948221 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):4362. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154362. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124629 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sneyd J.R., Rigby-Jones A.E. Remimazolam for anaesthesia or sedation. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2020;33(4):506–511. - PubMed
-
- Doi M., et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial. J. Anesth. 2020;34(4):543–553. - PubMed
-
- Hari Y., et al. Remimazolam decreased the incidence of early postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to desflurane after laparoscopic gynecological surgery. J. Anesth. 2022;36(2):265–269. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources