Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 14:7:e51675.
doi: 10.2196/51675.

Digital Literacy Training for Low-Income Older Adults Through Undergraduate Community-Engaged Learning: Single-Group Pretest-Posttest Study

Lisa M Soederberg Miller  1 , Rachel A Callegari  1 , Theresa Abah  2 , Helen Fann  1
Affiliations

Digital Literacy Training for Low-Income Older Adults Through Undergraduate Community-Engaged Learning: Single-Group Pretest-Posttest Study

Lisa M Soederberg Miller et al. JMIR Aging. .

Abstract

Background: Digital technology is a social determinant of health that affects older people's ability to engage in health maintenance and disease prevention activities; connect with family and friends; and, more generally, age in place. Unfortunately, disparities in technology adoption and use exist among older adults compared with other age groups and are even greater among low-income older adults.

Objective: In this study, we described the development and implementation of a digital literacy training program designed with the dual goals of training low-income older adults in the community and teaching students about aging using a community-engaged learning (CEL) approach.

Methods: The training program was embedded within a 10-week CEL course that paired undergraduates (N=27) with low-income older adults (n=18) for 8 weeks of digital literacy training. Older adults and students met weekly at the local senior center for the training. Students also met in the classroom weekly to learn about aging and how to use design thinking to train their older adult trainees. Both older adults and students completed pre- and posttraining surveys.

Results: Older adults demonstrated increased digital literacy skills and confidence in the use of digital technology. Loneliness did not change from pre to postassessment measurements; however, older adults showed improvements in their attitudes toward their own aging and expressed enthusiasm for the training program. Although students' fear of older adults did not change, their comfort in working with older adults increased. Importantly, older adults and students expressed positive feelings about the trainee-trainer relationship that they formed during the training program.

Conclusions: A CEL approach that brings together students and low-income older adults in the community has a strong potential to reduce the digital divide experienced by underserved older adults. Additional work is needed to explore the efficacy and scalability of this approach in terms of older adults' digital literacy as well as other potential benefits to both older and younger adults.

Keywords: community-engaged learning; digital divide; digital literacy training; intergenerational programs; underserved older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual model of digital literacy training.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of how the digital literacy training was integrated into the community-engaged learning (CEL) course.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Technology proficiency at pretest and posttest by Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ-16) scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Philbin MM, Parish C, Pereyra M, Feaster DJ, Cohen M, Wingood G, Konkle-Parker D, Adedimeji A, Wilson TE, Cohen J, Goparaju L, Adimora AA, Golub ET, Metsch LR. Health disparities and the digital divide: the relationship between communication inequalities and quality of life among women in a nationwide prospective cohort study in the United States. J Health Commun. 2019;24(4):405–12. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1630524. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sieck CJ, Sheon A, Ancker JS, Castek J, Callahan B, Siefer A. Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 17;4(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8.10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh GK, Girmay M, Allender M, Christine RT. Digital divide: marked disparities in computer and broadband internet use and associated health inequalities in the United States. Int J Transl Med Res Public Health. 2020 Jun;4(1):64–79. doi: 10.21106/ijtmrph.148. - DOI
    1. Drazich BF, Lee JW, Bowles KH, Taylor JL, Shah S, Resnick B, Kim N, Szanton SL. Pandemic-related changes in technology use among a sample of previously hospitalized older adult New Yorkers: observational study. JMIR Aging. 2023 Mar 29;6:e41692. doi: 10.2196/41692.v6i1e41692 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gauthier GR, Smith JA, García C, Garcia MA, Thomas PA. Exacerbating inequalities: social networks, racial/ethnic disparities, and the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Feb 17;76(3):e88–92. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa117.5881435 - DOI - PMC - PubMed