Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):e007675.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007675.

Defining D-irAEs: consensus-based disease definitions for the diagnosis of dermatologic adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Affiliations

Defining D-irAEs: consensus-based disease definitions for the diagnosis of dermatologic adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Steven T Chen et al. J Immunother Cancer. .

Abstract

With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.

Keywords: Guidelines as Topic; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MS: Consulting with Amgen, AbbVie, Arcutis, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly Canada, Fresenius Kabi Canada, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, L’Oreal Canada, LEO Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB Canada.LCC: Research funding- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consulting- AmgenAM: Research Funding: Amryt Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Kintara Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure Consulting: ADC Therapeutics, Alira Health, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Protagonist Therapeutics, OnQuality, and Janssen Royalties: UpToDateCAN: CAN has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and participated in an advisory board for work related to pustular psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis.VH: Royalties from UpToDateML: Research funding: Onquality, Novartis, AZ, Lutris, Novocure; Consulting: Onquality, Novartis, AZ, Lutris, Novocure, La Roche Posay, JanssenMC: PI for Blueprint, Cogent, Author for UpToDateNRL: Consultant for or has received honoraria from Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Bayer, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Silverback and Synox Therapeutics outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Approach to diagnosis of dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs). By following the algorithm, clinicians can use specific morphologic findings and suggested evaluation to reach a core D-irAE diagnosis with variable diagnostic certainty and severity grading. If a core diagnosis is not reached, a non-specific D-irAE can still be graded by severity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical photos of core dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAE) diagnoses. (A) ICI-Psoriasis; (B) ICI-Lichen planus; (C) ICI-Bullous pemphigoid; (D) ICI-Vitiligo; (E) ICI-Grovers; (F) ICI-Eczematous dermatitis; (G) ICI-Exanthem; (H) ICI-Eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, (I) ICI-Erosive mucocutaneous. ICI, Immune checkpoint inhibitor.

References

    1. Wongvibulsin S, Pahalyants V, Kalinich M, et al. . Epidemiology and risk factors for the development of cutaneous toxicities in patients treated with immune-Checkpoint inhibitors: A United States population-level analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022;86:563–72. 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gong J, Chehrazi-Raffle A, Reddi S, et al. . Development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as a form of cancer Immunotherapy: a comprehensive review of registration trials and future considerations. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:8. 10.1186/s40425-018-0316-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haslam A, Prasad V. Estimation of the percentage of US patients with cancer who are eligible for and respond to checkpoint inhibitor Immunotherapy drugs. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e192535. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellis SR, Vierra AT, Millsop JW, et al. . Dermatologic toxicities to immune Checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A review of histopathologic features. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;83:1130–43. 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.105 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennedy LB, Salama AKS. A review of cancer Immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:86–104. 10.3322/caac.21596 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances