Measurement protocols and determinants of peak oxygen consumption in adults with Down syndrome: a systematic review
- PMID: 38600638
- DOI: 10.1111/jir.13137
Measurement protocols and determinants of peak oxygen consumption in adults with Down syndrome: a systematic review
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of test protocols used to measure peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in adults with Down syndrome (DS) and to determine how generalisable the outcomes are for the entire population of adults with DS by describing the sample characteristics of these studies and their impact on VO2peak. A literature search (PROSPERO CRD42022309560) was performed (18 July 2023) using the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase and SPORTDiscus. For articles to be included, they had to be peer-reviewed pubications, reporting VO2peak or VO2max for individuals with DS separately, with a sample of n ≥ 5 and a mean age ≥18 years. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded but their reference lists were searched for additional papers to include. Studies were evaluated for risk of bias following the guidelines of Kmet et al. The results were summarised with frequency statistics. Forty-three studies were included in this systematic review. Sample sizes of included adults with DS ranged from n = 4-226, with a total of n = 1498 adults with DS being included. Most studies (29/43) used the same standardised maximal exercise treadmill protocol to measure VO2peak in adults with DS, and 33 out of 43 studies used at least one objective criterion to determine a valid maximal effort. Participants were predominantly male, under 40 years old, and overweight or obese. Additionally, the diversity of study samples was lacking or not reported. The most widely used, standardised, maximal exercise test treadmill protocol is recommended for future use in research and practice, including objective criteria to determine valid maximal effort. The current study samples are not representative of the population of adults with DS in terms of sex, age and diverse backgrounds and therefore likely overestimate VO2peak of this population.
Keywords: aerobic capacity; cardiorespiratory fitness; exercise testing; intellectual disabilities; reference values; standardisation.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by John Wiley & Sons and MENCAP.
References
-
- Alexander M., Petri H., Ding Y., Wandel C., Khwaja O. & Foskett N. (2016) Morbidity and medication in a large population of individuals with Down syndrome compared to the general population. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 58, 246–254.
-
- Al‐Mallah M. H., Sakr S. & Al‐Qunaibet A. (2018) Cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular disease prevention: an update. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 20, 1.
-
- American College of Sports Medicine (2022) ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia.
-
- Ayán‐Pérez C., Martínez‐Lemos R. I. & Cancela‐Carral J. M. (2017) Reliability and convergent validity of the 6‐min run test in young adults with Down syndrome. Disability and Health Journal 10, 105–113.
-
- Bar‐Or O., Skinner J. S., Bergsteinova V., Shearburn C., Royer D., Bell W. et al. (1971) Maximal aerobic capacity of 6–15 year‐old girls and boys with subnormal intelligence quotients. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica. Supplement 217, 108–113.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
