Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Apr 1;53(4):afae069.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae069.

Long-term development of loneliness in older people and associations with stringency of COVID-19 measures: an observational cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Long-term development of loneliness in older people and associations with stringency of COVID-19 measures: an observational cohort study

Flurina Meier Schwarzer et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: Most longitudinal studies found heightened feelings of loneliness in older people in spring 2020 compared to times before the pandemic. However, longer-term effects are more disputed. We, therefore, investigated changes in loneliness in older people throughout the first 21 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland and examined the association between the stringency of COVID-19 measures and feelings of loneliness.

Methods: We assessed loneliness (3-item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) loneliness scale) in a nationally representative longitudinal observational online survey. Older people (65-79 years) were surveyed between March 2020 and December 2021. Proportions of people feeling lonely (UCLA loneliness scale >6) were compared in two stringent phases ('lockdown', Oxford University stringency index ≥55) and two less restricted phases. Additionally, we explored the situation of potentially more susceptible subgroups (living alone, women, chronic and mental diseases, low educational level and low income).

Results: Phases with stringent measures were associated with higher levels of loneliness in older people. People living alone, women, people with noncommunicable or mental disease diagnoses and lower income show consistently higher levels of loneliness. However, the differences are not accentuated in phases with more stringent measures. We found little differences between subgroups with varying educational levels.

Conclusions: Even in a country with relatively less stringent COVID-19 measures like Switzerland, an increase in the proportion of older people that feel lonely could be found during phases with more stringent COVID-19 measures. Lockdown phases should, therefore, be accompanied by evidence-based interventions to relieve loneliness to avoid adverse short- and long-term consequences.

Keywords: longitudinal study; older people; pandemic; social isolation; vulnerable subgroups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
UCLA loneliness scale over the first 21 months of the pandemic and Oxford University stringency index. Phases I and III: more stringent: Oxford University stringency index: ≥55; phases II and IV: less stringent: Oxford University stringency index: <55. The blue dashed line shows the values of the Oxford University stringency index; the purple line with shorter dashes shows the Oxford University stringency index cut-off point of 55.
Figure 2
Figure 2
High feelings of loneliness (UCLA loneliness scale >6) in four phases with more versus less stringent measures. Phases I and III: more stringent: Oxford University stringency index: ≥55; phases II and IV: less stringent: Oxford University stringency index: <55.
Figure 3
Figure 3
High feelings of loneliness (UCLA loneliness scale >6) according to the four phases of more versus less stringent measures by subgroups. Phases I and III: more stringent: Oxford University stringency index: ≥55; phases II and IV: less stringent: Oxford University stringency index: <55.

References

    1. Hanratty B, Stow D, Collingridge Moore D, Valtorta NK, Matthews F. Loneliness as a risk factor for care home admission in the English longitudinal study of ageing. Age Ageing 2018; 47: 896–900. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015; 10: 227–37. - PubMed
    1. Lambert, Van As BA, Imbimbo E, Franceschi Aet al. . The longitudinal association between loneliness and depressive symptoms in the elderly: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2022; 34: 657–669. - PubMed
    1. Lara E, Martín-María N, De la Torre-Luque Aet al. . Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Ageing Res Rev 2019; 52: 7–16. - PubMed
    1. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Hanratty B. Loneliness, social isolation and social relationships: what are we measuring? A novel framework for classifying and comparing tools. BMJ Open 2016; 6: 1–7, e010799. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types