A Randomized Evaluation of MoodFX, a Patient-Centred e-Health Tool to Support Outcome Measurement for Depression: Une évaluation randomisée de MoodFX, un outil de santé en ligne centré sur le patient pour soutenir la mesure du résultat dans la dépression
- PMID: 38600892
- PMCID: PMC11168344
- DOI: 10.1177/07067437241245331
A Randomized Evaluation of MoodFX, a Patient-Centred e-Health Tool to Support Outcome Measurement for Depression: Une évaluation randomisée de MoodFX, un outil de santé en ligne centré sur le patient pour soutenir la mesure du résultat dans la dépression
Abstract
Background: e-Health tools using validated questionnaires to assess outcomes may facilitate measurement-based care for psychiatric disorders. MoodFX was created as a free online symptom tracker to support patients for outcome measurement in their depression treatment. We conducted a pilot randomized evaluation to examine its usability, and clinical utility.
Methods: Patients presenting with a major depressive episode (within a major depressive or bipolar disorder) were randomly assigned to receive either MoodFX or a health information website as the intervention and control condition, respectively, with follow-up assessment surveys conducted online at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months. The primary usability outcomes included the percentage of patients with self-reported use of MoodFX 3 or more times during follow up (indicating minimally adequate usage) and usability measures based on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Secondary clinical outcomes included the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated (QIDS-SR) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
Results: Forty-nine participants were randomized (24 to MoodFX and 25 to the control condition). Of the 23 participants randomized to MoodFX who completed the user survey, 18 (78%) used MoodFX 3 or more times over the 6 months of the study. The mean SUS score of 72.7 (65th-69th percentile) represents good usability. Compared to the control group, the MoodFX group had significantly better improvement on QIDS-SR and PHQ-9 scores, with large effect sizes and higher response rates at 6 months. There were no differences between conditions on other secondary outcomes such as functioning and quality of life.
Conclusion: MoodFX demonstrated good usability and was associated with reduction in depressive symptoms. This pilot study supports the use of digital tools in depression treatment.
Contexte: Les outils de santé en ligne qui utilisent des questionnaires validés pour évaluer les résultats peuvent faciliter les soins basés sur la mesure (SBM) pour les troubles psychiatriques. MoodFX a été créé à titre de suivi des symptômes en ligne gratuit pour soutenir la mesure des résultats des patients pour leur traitement de la dépression. Nous avons mené une évaluation randomisée pilote pour en examiner l’utilisabilité et l’utilité clinique.
Méthodes: Les patients présentant un épisode dépressif majeur (dans le cadre d’un trouble dépressif majeur ou d’un trouble bipolaire) ont été assignés au hasard à recevoir soit un MoodFX ou un site Web d’information de santé comme condition d’intervention et de contrôle, respectivement, avec des sondages d’évaluation de suivi menés en ligne à la base, après 8 semaines et 6 mois. Les premiers résultats d’utilisabilité comportaient le pourcentage de patients ayant un usage auto-déclaré de MoodFix trois fois ou plus durant le suivi (indiquant un usage minimalement adéquat) et des mesures d’utilisabilité basées sur l’Échelle d’utilisabilité du système (EUS). Les résultats cliniques secondaires comprenaient l’Inventaire rapide de la symptomatologie dépressive auto-déclarée (QIDS-SR) et le questionnaire de santé du patient (PHQ-9).
Résultats: Quarante-neuf participants ont été randomisés (24 au MoodFX et 25 à la condition de contrôle). Sur les 23 participants randomisés au MoodFX qui ont terminé le sondage de l’utilisateur, 18 (78%) ont utilisé MoodFX trois fois ou plus au cours des six mois de l’étude. Le score EUS moyen de 72,7 (65–69e percentile) représente une bonne utilisabilité. Comparé au groupe témoin, le groupe MoodFX avait une amélioration significativement meilleure aux scores QIDS-SR et PHQ-9 avec de grandes tailles d’effet et plus de taux de réponses à 6 mois. Il n’y avait pas de différences entre les conditions aux autres résultats secondaires comme le fonctionnement et la qualité de vie.
Conclusion: MoodFX a démontré une bonne utilisabilité et était associé à la réduction des symptômes dépressifs. Cette étude pilote soutient l’usage des outils numériques dans le traitement de la dépression.
Keywords: antidepressants; antidépresseurs; depressive disorders; e-mental health; essai randomisé contrôlé; randomized controlled trial; santé mentale en ligne; troubles dépressifs.
Plain language summary
E-health tools may be useful for measuring and tracking symptoms and other outcomes during treatment for depression. This study is a randomized evaluation of MoodFX, a free web-based app that helps patients track their symptoms using validated questionnaires, and also offers depression information and self-management tips. A total of 49 participants with clinical depression were randomized to using MoodFX or a health information website, for 6 months. In a survey, the participants that used MoodFX found it easy and useful to use. In addition, the participants that used MoodFX had greater improvement in depressive symptoms after 6 months, compared to those who used the health information website. These results suggest that MoodFX may be a useful tool to monitor outcomes and support depression treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsRWL has received honoraria for ad hoc speaking or advising/consulting, or received research funds, from: Abbvie, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Bausch, BC Leading Edge Foundation, Brain Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments, CB Solutions, Carnot, Genome BC, Grand Challenges Canada, Healthy Minds Canada, Janssen, Lundbeck, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, MITACS, Neurotorium, Ontario Brain Institute, Otsuka, Pfizer/Viatris, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Unity Health, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and VGH-UBCH Foundation. AD was partly supported by an unrestricted fellowship grant from Janssen Canada and has received honoraria for ad hoc speaking or advising/consulting, or received research funds, from: AbbVie, Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Otsuka. JJN was partially supported by a Marshall/Institute of Mental Health Fellowship Award and received unrestricted research funding from the BC Cancer Foundation, with funds originating from Pfizer. KK is supported as a health professional investigator by Michael Smith Health Research Foundation of BC, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and VGH & UBC Hospital Foundation and has previously served on the scientific advisory board of AbbVie. EEM has received support for patient education activities from Otsuka-Lundbeck. LNY has received honoraria for ad hoc speaking or advising/consulting, or received research funds, from: AbbVie, Alkermes, Allergan, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Intracellular Therapies, Lundbeck, Merck, Otsuka, Sanofi, and Sunovion. VWL, VCE, JS, DKD, DDG, AA, EMT and JKM have no disclosures.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparing the Efficacy of Electronically Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (e-CBT) to Weekly Online Mental Health Check-Ins for Generalized Anxiety Disorder-A Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparaison de l'efficacité de la thérapie cognitivo-comportementale délivrée par voie électronique (e-TCC) aux contrôles hebdomadaires en ligne de santé mentale pour le trouble d'anxiété généralisée - un essai randomisé contrôlé.Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;69(9):695-707. doi: 10.1177/07067437241261933. Epub 2024 Jul 21. Can J Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39033431 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cash Transfers may Increase the No-show Rate for Surgical Patients in Low-resource Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial.West Afr J Med. 2022 Aug 31;39(8):852-858. West Afr J Med. 2022. PMID: 36066508 Clinical Trial.
-
N° 367-2019 Lignes Directrices Canadiennes Sur L'activité Physique Durant La Grossesse.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Nov;40(11):1538-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 18. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018. PMID: 30343980
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Predicting Relapse of Depressive Episodes During Maintenance Treatment: The Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND) Wellness Monitoring in Major Depressive Disorder Study: Prédire la rechute d'épisodes dépressifs pendant le traitement d'entretien : Une étude de suivi du bien-être dans les troubles dépressifs majeurs du Réseau canadien d'intégration des biomarqueurs pour la dépression (CAN-BIND).Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;70(7):565-573. doi: 10.1177/07067437251337603. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Can J Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40302412 Free PMC article.
-
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of iCanWork: Theory-Guided Return-to-Work Intervention for Individuals Touched by Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2025 May 1;32(5):266. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050266. Curr Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40422525 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving Mental Health Outcomes in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in the Gulf States: A Review of the Role of Electronic Enablers in Monitoring Residual Symptoms.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jul 11;17:3341-3354. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S475078. eCollection 2024. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024. PMID: 39010931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The implementation of digital biomarkers in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of mood disorders: a narrative review.Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;7:1595243. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1595243. eCollection 2025. Front Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40599874 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx), https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ (2023, accessed 4 March 2023).
-
- Lam RW, Parikh SV, Michalak EE, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) consensus recommendations for functional outcomes in major depressive disorder. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2015;27:142–149. - PubMed
-
- Herrman H, Kieling C, McGorry P, et al. Reducing the global burden of depression: a Lancet-World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet. 2019;393:e42–e43. - PubMed
-
- Zhu M, Hong RH, Yang T, et al. The efficacy of measurement-based care for depressive disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021;82:20210928. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials