Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):e5735.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005735. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Edge Labiaplasty with Clitoral Hood Reduction: Pitfalls and Pearls

Rachel L Pan  1 , Tannon L Tople  2 , Shane D Morrison  3 , Adam J Oppenheimer  4
Affiliations

Edge Labiaplasty with Clitoral Hood Reduction: Pitfalls and Pearls

Rachel L Pan et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Before and after LCR standing (A, B) and in lithotomy (C, D) at 6 weeks postoperatively.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Miklos JR, Moore RD. Labiaplasty of the labia minora: patients’ indications for pursuing surgery. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1492–1495. - PubMed
    1. Hamori CA. Postoperative clitoral hood deformity after labiaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:1030–1036. - PubMed
    1. Hunter JG. Labia minora, labia majora, and clitoral hood alteration: experience-based recommendations. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:71–79. - PubMed
    1. Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. A retrospective study of the psychological outcomes of labiaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:324–331. - PubMed
    1. Goodman MP, Placik OJ, Benson RH, et al. . A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1565–1577. - PubMed