Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;85(3):1206-1212.
doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03815-2. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

Development and internal validation of a clinical score to predict neonatal hypoglycaemia in women with gestational diabetes

Affiliations

Development and internal validation of a clinical score to predict neonatal hypoglycaemia in women with gestational diabetes

Bruna Silva et al. Endocrine. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes (GD) is a risk factor for neonatal hypoglycaemia (NH), but other factors can increase this risk.

Objectives: To create a score to predict NH in women with GD.

Methods: Retrospective study of women with GD with a live singleton birth between 2012 and 2017 from the Portuguese GD registry. Pregnancies with and without NH were compared. A logistic regression was used to study NH predictors. Variables independently associated with NH were used to score derivation. The model's internal validation was performed by a bootstrapping. The association between the score and NH was assessed by logistic regression.

Results: We studied 10216 pregnancies, 410 (4.0%) with NH. The model's AUC was 0.628 (95%CI: 0.599-0.657). Optimism-corrected c-index: 0.626. Points were assigned to variables associated with NH in proportion to the model's lowest regression coefficient: insulin-treatment 1, preeclampsia 3, preterm delivery 2, male sex 1, and small-for-gestational-age 2, or large-for-gestational-age 3. NH prevalence by score category 0-1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 was 2.3%, 3.0%, 4.5%, 6.0%, 7.4%, and 11.5%, respectively. Per point, the OR for NH was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.27-1.42). A score of 2, 3, 4, 5 or ≥6 (versus ≤1) had a OR for NH of 1.67 (1.29-2.15), 2.24 (1.65-3.04), 2.83 (2.02-3.98), 3.08 (1.83-5.16), and 6.84 (4.34-10.77), respectively.

Conclusion: Per each score point, women with GD had 35% higher risk of NH. Those with ≥6 points had 6.8-fold higher risk of NH compared to a score ≤1. Our score may be useful for identifying women at a higher risk of NH.

Keywords: Clinical score; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Neonatal hypoglycaemia; Prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. A. Sweeting et al. A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Endocr. Rev. 43(5), 763–793 (2022) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 358(19), 1991–2002 (2008)
    1. T. Edwards, J.E. Harding, Clinical Aspects of Neonatal Hypoglycemia: A Mini Review. Front. Pediatr. 8, 562251 (2020) - DOI - PubMed
    1. T. Arimitsu et al., Risk factors of neonatal hypoglycemia in neonates born to mothers with gestational diabetes. Endocr. J., 70, 511–517 (2023).
    1. D.L. Harris, P.J. Weston, J.E. Harding, Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk. J. Pediatr. 161(5), 787–791 (2012) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources