Bioethics after the COVID-19 pandemic: More research, fewer committees?
- PMID: 38603418
- PMCID: PMC9597279
- DOI: 10.1177/14777509221134243
Bioethics after the COVID-19 pandemic: More research, fewer committees?
Abstract
In the face of the pandemic, bioethics, once again, proved its scientific utility. In France, in particular, the academic approach (= peer-reviewed, scientific publications, etc.) should be given priority over the institutional approach (= public surveys, public meetings, etc.), in hospitals, research institutes, universities, and companies, with the professionalization that this would imply (i.e. bioethicists).
Keywords: Bioethics; COVID-19; France; bioethicist; global bioethics; meta-discipline.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Lewis J. A new era for clinical ethics. Clin Ethics 2022; 17: 221–224.
-
- Stoekle HC, Herve C. COVID-19: act first, think later. Am J Bioeth 2020; 1. - PubMed
-
- Stoeklé H-C, Ivasilevitch A, Ladrat L, et al.[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the hospital: the contribution of bioethics.]. Méd Catastr Urgences Collect 2022; 6: 99–104. [In French].
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources