Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2339040.
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2339040. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

R.I.M.E. and reason: multi-station OSCE enhancement to neutralize grade inflation

Affiliations

R.I.M.E. and reason: multi-station OSCE enhancement to neutralize grade inflation

Michael Rouse et al. Med Educ Online. .

Abstract

To offset grade inflation, many clerkships combine faculty evaluations with objective assessments including the Medical Examiners Subject Examination (NBME-SE) or Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), however, standardized methods are not established. Following a curriculum transition removing faculty clinical evaluations from summative grading, final clerkship designations of fail (F), pass (P), and pass-with-distinction (PD) were determined by combined NBME-SE and OSCE performance, with overall PD for the clerkship requiring meeting this threshold in both. At the time, 90% of students achieved PD on the Internal Medicine (IM) OSCE resulting in overall clerkship grades primarily determined by the NBME-SE. The clerkship sought to enhance the OSCE to provide a more thorough objective clinical skills assessment, offset grade inflation, and reduce the NBME-SE primary determination of the final clerkship grade. The single-station 43-point OSCE was enhanced to a three-station 75-point OSCE using the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator (RIME) framework to align patient encounters with targeted assessments of progressive skills and competencies related to the clerkship rotation. Student performances were evaluated pre- and post-OSCE enhancement. Student surveys provided feedback about the clinical realism of the OSCE and the difficulty. Pre-intervention OSCE scores were more tightly clustered (SD = 5.65%) around a high average performance with scores being highly negatively skewed. Post-intervention OSCE scores were more dispersed (SD = 6.88%) around a lower average with scores being far less skewed resulting in an approximately normal distribution. This lowered the total number of students achieving PD on the OSCE and PD in the clerkship, thus reducing the relative weight of the NMBE-SE in the overall clerkship grade. Student response was positive, indicating the examination was fair and reflective of their clinical experiences. Through structured development, OSCE assessment can provide a realistic and objective measurement of clinical performance as part of the summative evaluation of students.

Keywords: OSCE; RIME; assessment; clerkship; grade inflation; internal medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overall concept of OSCE patient encounters adapted from Meyers et al.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Frequency & Pearson Type IV distributions of percent correct earned on OSCE by academic year.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percent response selected & average response by survey question.

References

    1. Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Fincher RM.. Grade inflation in internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey. Teach Learn Med. 2000. Summer;12(3):112–8. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1203_1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fazio SB, Papp KK, Torre DM, et al. Grade inflation in the internal medicine clerkship: a national survey. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(1):71–76. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.741541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiel KZ, Everard KM. Grade inflation in the family medicine clerkship. Fam Med. 2019. Nov;51(10):806–810. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.614620 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Westerman ME, Boe C, Bole R, et al. Evaluation of medical school grading variability in the United States: are all honors the same? Acad Med. 2019. Dec;94(12):1939–1945. - PubMed
    1. Zaidi NLB, Kreiter CD, Castaneda PR, et al. Generalizability of competency assessment scores across and within clerkships: how students, assessors, and clerkships matter. Acad Med. 2018. Aug;93(8):1212–1217. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources