Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection reagent LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT using nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples
- PMID: 38604076
- DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116297
Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection reagent LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT using nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples
Abstract
The LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT allows for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in saliva samples with a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method and generates results within 20 min. It has been approved by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan. In this study, the performance of the LAMPdirect Genelyzer KIT was compared with that of the RT-qPCR reference method using 50 nasopharyngeal swabs and 100 saliva samples. In addition, we evaluated the applicability of an alternative reverse transcriptase and the effects of an inactivation buffer. The total agreement rates were 80.0 % and 82.0 % for nasopharyngeal and saliva samples, respectively. When considering samples at the detection limit (50 copies/reaction) that increases the chance of transmission between humans, the total agreement rates were 100% and 94.1% for nasopharyngeal and saliva samples, respectively. The LAMP method is simple, fast, and inexpensive, making it useful for small medical institutions or rural areas.
Keywords: COVID-19; Clinical sample; In vitro diagnostics (IVD); Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP); RT-qPCR; SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest MK received research grants from Canon Medical Systems Corp. [grant numbers 22C013 and 23C002] for the submitted work. MK received research grants from SB Coronavirus Inspection Center Corp., and Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd.outside the submitted work. KY received research grants from Fujirebio Inc., Mizuho Medy Co. Ltd., VisGene Co. Ltd., Canon Medical Systems Corp., Sanyo Chemical Industries Ltd., CarbGeM Inc., Sysmex Corp., and Toyobo Co. Ltd. outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of self-collected nasal, urine, and saliva samples for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 using an EUA approved RT-PCR assay and a laboratory developed LAMP SARS-CoV-2 test.Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Jun;12(6):e1285. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1285. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024. PMID: 38888444 Free PMC article.
-
Multisite Clinical Validation of Isothermal Amplification-Based SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays Using Different Sampling Strategies.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0084621. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00846-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34668736 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled to nanopore sequencing (LamPORE) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection at scale in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Sep;27(9):1348.e1-1348.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 24. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021. PMID: 33901668 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253007. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34111196 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Using Different Sample Sources: Review of the Literature.Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Apr;100(2_suppl):131S-138S. doi: 10.1177/0145561320953231. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021. PMID: 32865458 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous